hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effectiveness of Core Stability Exercises on Low Back Pain among Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability.
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability.
2025 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Postpartum low back pain (PP-LBP) commonly affects women after childbirth due to core muscle weakness, hormonal changes, and altered biomechanics. It significantly impacts daily functioning and quality of life. Core Stability Exercises (CSE) have been widely used in postpartum rehabilitation, yet their overall effectiveness in managing PP-LBP has not been systematically evaluated. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of core stability exercises, either as a standalone approach or combined with otherphysiotherapy interventions in reducing pain, improving function and enhancing quality of life among postpartum women with low back pain.

METHODS: This PRISMA-guided systematic review searched PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials and quasi experimental studies published in English between 2004 to 2024 that included postpartum women (≥18 years) with low back pain, accessing CSE interventions with outcomes on pain, functional disability and quality of life. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB-2 tool for RCTs and ROBIN-1 tool for quasi experimental studies.

RESULTS: 950 records identified initially, 18 studies met inclusion criteria, including 13 RCTs and 5 quasi experimental studies with total of 772 postpartum women aged 18 to 45 years were included. Sample size ranged from 16 to 80 participants per study. Most studies showedsignificant reductions in pain and disability following CSE interventions. Protocols ranging from 4 to 8 weeks with 3 sessions/week were most common. A combined approach (e.g.postural correction, pelvic floor exercises, and electrotherapy) showed greater improvementsin all outcomes. Quality of life was not directly assessed in the included studies, making it difficult to evaluate the impact of CSEs on this outcome. Supervised and combined intervention strategies appear to yield better results. Risk of bias was generally moderate; most RCTs were rated as “some concern”, and quasi-experimental studies showed a “serious” risk of bias. Some studies also reported secondary benefits in core strength, pelvic floor function, inter-recti distance and urinary incontinence.

CONCLUSION: CSEs are effective in managing PP-LBP and improving functional statusparticularly when delivered in supervised or combined formats. These findings support the integration of CSE into postpartum rehabilitation. Furthermore, high-quality studies with longer follow-up and direct quality of life assessment are needed to provide more comprehensive evidence for clinical practice. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. , p. 53
Keywords [en]
Core Stability Exercises, Postpartum Low Back Pain, Physiotherapy Interventions, Rehabilitation, Pain Management, Pelvic Floor Muscles, Functional Outcomes
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-56348OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-56348DiVA, id: diva2:1968040
Educational program
Master's Programme in Exercise Biomedicine - Human Performance
Presentation
2025-06-02, S3056, Högskolan i Halmstad, Kristian IV:s väg 3, 301 18, Halmstad, 11:30 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2025-06-13 Created: 2025-06-12 Last updated: 2025-10-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(846 kB)473 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 846 kBChecksum SHA-512
d4125cbe94258041c3014f30534867496be750c6bcf81570c48a9b608733fc616ec15ff0df86693ec855df86aab6b00ab889715ee171f2d31bd17beeb52c65ca
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kaur, RupinderjitShahid, Ainna
By organisation
School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 474 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 822 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf