The thesis "CTEM: The Next Big Thing or Just a Buzzword? - A comparative study of CTEM and NIST CSF 2.0 in modern cyber risk management" investigates Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) compared to the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF) 2.0. Through a comparative analysis and interviews with cybersecurity professionals, the study aims to explore how CTEM can help organizations adopt a more continuous and adaptive approach to manage cybersecurity risks. 

The results show that CTEM offers a dynamic and proactive approach to threat management, focusing on continuous monitoring, while NIST CSF 2.0 relies more on traditional methods. It also identifies similarities and differences between the frameworks, recognizing that the continuous approach can complement the NIST CSF 2.0. That integration can strengthen the comprehensive cybersecurity strategy of organizations that addresses current and emerging threats. A combination of CTEM and NIST CSF 2.0 addresses challenges such as management support, which are discussed in the discussion. The combination can lead to sustained resilience to cyber threats and ensure a safer digital environment with economic benefits for organizations.