hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Top-down eller bottom-up?: En studie om hur tillit förstås inom svensk integrationspolitik
Halmstad University, School of Education, Humanities and Social Science.
Halmstad University, School of Education, Humanities and Social Science.
2025 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

In our paper, we studied five separate Swedish Government Official Reports, focused primarily on different integration processes, which were published throughout the period 2000-2024. Many of these reports focused on ways to build trust in immigrant communities. Because there are two rival theories on how to build trust: bottom-up through generalised trust or top-down through institutional trust, our study focused on discerning which of these perspectives seemed to inform the analyses presented in the reports. Primarily, we are interested in analysing whether or not there has been a shift over time in which of these two theories on trust-building are informing the analysis of the reports. We found that most reports recommended that trust be built primarily through trustworthy and reliable institutions. Over time, the top-down theory has remained the main explanatory theory of trust-building. However, the nuances of generalised trust have increasingly come into focus in the most recent reports, as more attention seems to be directed at the ways in which institutional trust impacts different facets of generalised trust. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. , p. 34
Keywords [en]
Generalised trust, Institutional trust, Swedish Government Official Reports, Integration, Top-down theory, Bottom-up theory
National Category
Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-56098OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-56098DiVA, id: diva2:1961963
Subject / course
Political Science
Educational program
Social Analysis and Communication, 180 credits
Examiners
Available from: 2025-05-28 Created: 2025-05-28 Last updated: 2025-10-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(759 kB)73 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 759 kBChecksum SHA-512
a05d7b119498a60d90ae1df9ffb0eb340f0dd44b0027a4a4651149578ad150bf8cf0b0f78ed6a43f76ca131912bffb57340adb3509b83e229f5595d3b5bed83d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Education, Humanities and Social Science
Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 74 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 255 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf