hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What is improvement science, and what makes it different? An outline of the field and its frontiers
Halmstad University, School of Health and Welfare. Julie Reed Consultancy Ltd., London, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9974-2017
Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Frontiers in Health Services, E-ISSN 2813-0146, Vol. 4, p. 1454658-, article id 1454658Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Improvement science has emerged as an interdisciplinary field of enquiry to provide methodological and scientific rigour to the practice and study of improvements in healthcare, and with contributions from a wide range of stakeholders and perspectives. However, compared to more well-established health-related sciences, the science of improvement remains in relative infancy. Whilst the improvement community has grown considerably, there is no existing articulation of the scope of what matters to the health and social care improvement community, and how this aligns to the enquiries of the field of improvement science. This paper aims to outline key areas of interest to the improvement community, and to propose distinguishing features of improvement science that help differentiate it from other areas of enquiry. Two over-arching research questions are identified, along with ten associated areas of enquiry which are grouped into three clusters: (1) improvement in practice, (2) aligning improvement efforts and (3) advancing the contribution of the improvement community. Four features that collectively define and distinguish the field of improvement science are proposed. The outline of the improvement landscape provides a common language for the diverse improvement community, supporting people to transcend disciplinary interests and constraints, and to consider how, collectively, we can improve health and care. Others are invited to refine and advance mapping of the improvement landscape by identifying gaps and increasing contributions from diverse perspectives. © 2025 Reed, Antonacci, Armstrong, Baker, Crowe, Harenstam, Hargreaves, Jani, Provost, Rejler, Savage, Thor, Williams and Woodcock.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lausanne: Frontiers Media S.A., 2024. Vol. 4, p. 1454658-, article id 1454658
Keywords [en]
complex system, healthcare, implementation sceince, improvement science, knowledge mobilisation, patient safety, quality improvement
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-55659DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1454658ISI: 001438046900001PubMedID: 40051505Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-86000292851OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-55659DiVA, id: diva2:1946074
Note

Funding:

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by a Health Foundation grant for advancing the frontiers of improvement science. JR, NA, SC, DH, YJ, SW, TW were supported by a Health Foundation Improvement Science Fellowships. KPH, MR, JT were supported by Vinnvard Improvement Science Fellowships. This research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Northwest London (CLAHRC NWL), now recommissioned as NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London (ARC NWL). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. © 2025 Reed, Antonacci, Armstrong, Baker, Crowe, Harenstam, Hargreaves, Jani, Provost, Rejler, Savage, Thor, Williams and Woodcock.

Available from: 2025-03-20 Created: 2025-03-20 Last updated: 2025-12-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Reed, Julie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Reed, Julie
By organisation
School of Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Frontiers in Health Services
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf