This essay examines how two of Sweden's most prominent newspapers, Dagligt Allehanda and Stockholms Posten, reported on the French Revolution during the last decade of the 18th century. Using compartive text analysis and framing theory as the theoretical framework, the newspapers' portrayals of key events such as the storming of the Bastille, the Women's March on Versailles, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, the execution of Louis XVI, the implementation of the Law of Suspects, and Napoleon's coup d'état are compared. The findings reveal that Dagligt Allehanda often expressed concern and skepticism towards the revolution's radical aspects, while Stockholms Posten highlighted the positive reforms and structural changes.