hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Healthcare workers' adoption of and satisfaction with artificial intelligence: The counterintuitive role of paradoxical tensions and paradoxical mindset
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9033-3957
Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; LUISS Guido Carli University, Rome, Italy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2648-4093
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0030-3402
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0560-7392
2025 (English)In: Technological forecasting & social change, ISSN 0040-1625, E-ISSN 1873-5509, Vol. 212, p. 1-17, article id 123967Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing healthcare by introducing novel treatments and applications, thereby transforming the sector. However, the complexity, ambiguity, and inherent risks associated with AI can create tensions for healthcare workers that may result in stress, anxiety, and discomfort when they make decisions. These tensions are paradoxical in nature as they may present conflicting demands that can persist over time and develop into seemingly irrational situations. Understanding how these paradoxical tensions affect healthcare workers' responses to AI is crucial in addressing their concerns. This study investigates the role of paradoxical tensions and the paradoxical mindset in shaping healthcare workers' responses to AI. The study examines how these two factors influence individuals' intention to adopt AI systems and tools and evaluates the users' satisfaction with them. Using a quantitative survey design, data were collected from 357 healthcare workers. The results, based on regression analysis, indicate that paradoxical tensions positively influence both individuals' intention to adopt AI systems and tools and their satisfaction with the current use of AI systems and tools. The results also indicate that the paradoxical mindset positively mediates these relationships. © 2024 The Authors

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 212, p. 1-17, article id 123967
Keywords [en]
Artificial intelligence, Health technology, Paradox theory, Paradoxical mindset, Paradoxical tensions, Technology adoption, User satisfaction
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-55288DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123967ISI: 001402475800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85214009960OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-55288DiVA, id: diva2:1930890
Funder
Knowledge Foundation
Note

This research was supported by the BINECO project (grant agreement no. 220021), funded by the Swedish Knowledge Foundation (KK-stiftelsen).

Available from: 2025-01-24 Created: 2025-01-24 Last updated: 2025-10-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Irgang dos Santos, Luís FernandoBarth, HenrikHolmén, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Irgang dos Santos, Luís FernandoSestino, AndreaBarth, HenrikHolmén, Magnus
By organisation
School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability
In the same journal
Technological forecasting & social change
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 171 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf