hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Beyond carbon footprint: practices and tools to implement Circular Economy in Swedish companies
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability. University of Groningen, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9466-2846
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9157-7400
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9584-3216
2025 (English)In: Cleaner Environmental Systems, ISSN 2666-7894, Vol. 18, p. 1-15, article id 100294Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Globally, the commitment of companies to Circular Economy (CE) is still limited. Mapping the circular practices performed by companies is a challenging and complex task and few empirical papers have explored CE implementation in companies. Based on interviews and analysis of company reports, we addressed in-depth the implementation of practices, targets, and assessment tools related to CE in ten Swedish companies. Only 10 circular practices out of 21 are implemented in at least 50% of the companies, indicating that the companies have just begun their transition to CE. The most common practices relate to waste reduction and resource efficiency (mainly energy). Barriers to collaboration are competition, keep confidentiality, small company size, lack of interest of other stakeholders, among others. So, there is a potential for increasing collaboration, especially with the municipality. The priority has been emissions reduction targets and the use of climate-focused tools (i.e., carbon footprint) while social aspects and circularity are less explored. We conclude that the monitoring of environmental performance is limited mainly to the use of resources and emissions. The low use of circularity tools is caused mainly by internal barriers such as lack of knowledge and shortage of resources. So, the companies should get more knowledge on CE assessment tools, include social indicators related to circular practices, and set targets for societal impact. © 2025 The Authors

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 18, p. 1-15, article id 100294
Keywords [en]
Assessment tools, barriers, Bio-based, Circular business models, Collaboration, Implementation
National Category
Environmental Management Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
Smart Cities and Communities, PROACTS
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-57083DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100294ISI: 001528184000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105009588255OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-57083DiVA, id: diva2:1985417
Available from: 2025-07-24 Created: 2025-07-24 Last updated: 2025-10-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Cardoso Chrispim, MarianaMattsson, MarieUlvenblad, Pia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cardoso Chrispim, MarianaMattsson, MarieUlvenblad, Pia
By organisation
School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability
Environmental ManagementProduction Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf