hh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of documented nursing care plans by the use of nursing-sensitive outcome indicators
Högskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för hälsa och samhälle (HOS), Centrum för forskning om välfärd, hälsa och idrott (CVHI).
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sweden.
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sweden.
2010 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice, ISSN 1356-1294, E-ISSN 1365-2753, Vol. 16, nr 3, s. 611-618Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Abstract Rationale and aim: There is a lack of evidence that nursing care plans affect patient outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether documented nursing care plans affect patient outcomes by the use of nursing-sensitive outcome indicators. Method: A retrospective, cross-sectional design with patients surveyed at time of discharge from two hospital units for patients with stroke and after 2-3 weeks at home. The control unit (A) did not employ care plans. The intervention unit (B) used care plans on a daily basis. Outcome was measured by 'the National Stroke Register' and the two questionnaires: 'Quality of patients' perspective' and 'Euroquol five dimensions'. Data were collected over a 5-month period (October 2007-February 2008). Results: In total, 87 patients were included in the study. Patient characteristics in the two groups at admission and the health-related quality of life 2 to 3 weeks after discharge were similar. The patients from unit B were more satisfied with individual care (P = 0.03) and participation (P = 0.007). Unit B also had a shorter length of stay (P = 0.004). Conclusions: The effects of documented care plans are difficult to evaluate from a patient perspective, as many factors can improve the outcome. However, documentation of care plans is a prerequisite for measuring the quality and outcome of the care provided. This small study indicates that documented care plans may affect patient satisfaction regarding individual care, participation and length of hospital stay.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2010. Vol. 16, nr 3, s. 611-618
Emneord [en]
Care plans, Empirical research report, Nursing diagnosis, Outcome, Stroke
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-3709DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01233.xISI: 000278077900034PubMedID: 20039996Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77952940643OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-3709DiVA, id: diva2:288719
Tilgjengelig fra: 2010-01-21 Laget: 2010-01-21 Sist oppdatert: 2025-10-01bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Planerad processorienterad omvårdnad - nytta och implementering
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Planerad processorienterad omvårdnad - nytta och implementering
2010 (svensk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

To ensure the provision of good and safe nursing care in the ward, the nursing needs of each patient should be established and clearly documented in the form of care plans in his/her medical record. There is a lack of scientific evidence of the benefits of this method of working as well as why this part of the nursing process is not always successful. The main aim of this thesis was to describe the assessment and decision-making process pertaining to nursing needs performed by nurses, to evaluate the consequences of planned, process oriented nursing care and to identify the factors and conditions that have had an impact on the implementation of individual care plans (ICP) and standardized care plans (SCP).

 

In studies I and III, qualitative methods were used. In study I, data collection and analysis were carried out by means of Grounded theory. Study III was conducted by means of directed content analysis and guided by “The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework”. In studies II and IV, quantitative methods were employed.

 

The benefits of a planned, process oriented method of working involving documentation of care plans have been investigated from the perspective of both the patient and the nurse. Nurses who applied the process oriented method adopted a nursing perspective in the assessment of and decision making pertaining to the patient’s nursing needs, which was not the case with nurses who did not work in this way and who instead exhibited a more medical approach (I). Patients cared for in wards where care plans were documented reported being more involved and that the care was more tailored to their individual needs compared to those not cared for in this manner (II). Leadership that prioritises the development of nursing care is essential for the implementation and continued use of ICPs and SCPs. Another important factor was the presence of internal facilitators in the ward in the form of nurses with a clear mandate to work with these issues. The nurses reported that they did not discuss scientific evidence as a basis for performing planned process oriented nursing care and that they did not listen to patient experiences to any great extent (III, IV).

 

The conclusion is that structured, process oriented nursing care based on written care plans probably promotes the nursing perspective and enables patient participation. Leadership as well as facilitators with a clear role and mandate are important factors in the implementation of this method of working and scientific evidence is of less importance.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet, 2010. s. 67
Emneord
Nursing process, assessment, judgment, individual care plans, standardized care plans, implementation, PARIHS framework
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-5612 (URN)978-91-628-8043-9 (ISBN)
Disputas
2010-05-07, Göteborg, 13:00 (svensk)
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2010-09-07 Laget: 2010-09-07 Sist oppdatert: 2025-10-01bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Jansson, Inger

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Jansson, Inger
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 375 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf