Since Hamas victory in the Palestinian election in Gaza, Likud has governed Israel for the majority of the time. Numerous times, these two leading parties have worked for a solution to this conflict. Due to multiple reasons that have led to failed accords of reaching an agreement, tens of thousands of civilians have lost their lives. The purpose of this study is to critically examine the Likud Party’s visions for peace in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine. By implementing Edward Said's postcolonial theory as the theoretical framework, this study investigates the Likud Party's vision for peace after the Palestinian election of 2006, and how it’s reflected in their party characters and speeches. The study provides a pattern of numerous occasions where the Likud Party has been inconsistent on their stand to the acceptance of a Palestinian state and a solution to the conflict, which can be interpreted as an obstacle for a peace process.