Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2025 (English)In: Europace, ISSN 1099-5129, E-ISSN 1532-2092, Vol. 27, no 9, p. 1-9, article id euaf190Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF), often asymptomatic and underdiagnosed, is an independent risk factor for ischaemic stroke. A knowledge gap remains regarding the optimal target population and method to use for AF screening. We aimed to test whether screening for AF using a machine learning–based risk prediction model (RPM) and 14-day continuous patch electrocardiogram (ECG) (Philips ePatch) in high-risk individuals ≥ 65 years is more effective than standard care. Methods and results Individuals ≥ 65 years were assigned to general or RPM cohort. The general cohort was randomized to control or invitation. In the RPM cohort, high-risk individuals, identified by RPM, were randomized to control or invitation. The primary outcome was 6-month AF incidence, analysed as intention-to-invite, comparing RPM + invitation with general + control. Of the 2960 randomized individuals, participation was 43% (632/1480) in invitation arms. Atrial fibrillation incidence was higher in RPM + invitation than in general + control arm (3.8%, 28/740 vs. 0.7%, 5/740; P < 0.001), yielding a risk ratio of 5.6, [95% confidence interval (2.2, 14.4)], and a number needed to invite of 32. Atrial fibrillation was more often detected in RPM + invitation than in general + invitation arm (1.1%, 8/740; P < 0.001), but not more often than in RPM + control arm (2.2%, 16/740; P = 0.07). No difference was found between general + invitation and general + control arms (1.1%, 8/740 vs. 0.7%, 5/740; P = 0.40). Conclusion Among high-risk individuals ≥ 65 years, the combination of a machine learning–based RPM and long-term ECG recording was superior to standard care in identifying new AF cases. © The Author(s) 2025.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025
Keywords
Atrial Fibrillation, Ischaemic Stroke, Long-term Ecg Recording, Machine Learning, Screening, Age, Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Controlled Study, Diagnosis, Electrocardiography, Epidemiology, Female, Human, Incidence, Machine Learning, Male, Mass Screening, Pathophysiology, Phenotype, Predictive Value, Procedures, Randomized Controlled Trial, Risk Assessment, Risk Factor, Sweden, Very Elderly, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 And Over, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Incidence, Machine Learning, Male, Mass Screening, Phenotype, Predictive Value Of Tests, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-57458 (URN)10.1093/europace/euaf190 (DOI)40842182 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105016509680 (Scopus ID)
2025-10-222025-10-222025-10-22Bibliographically approved