hh.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 1 of 1
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Hultén, Erik
    et al.
    Halmstad University, School of Business, Engineering and Science.
    Nilsson, Adam
    Halmstad University, School of Business, Engineering and Science.
    Jämförelseanalys av lastbärande betongstommar: En studie med avseende på tid & ekonomi2016Independent thesis Basic level (university diploma), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
    Abstract [en]

    The choice of selecting framework is a central part of any construction project, accounting for about 25 percent of the total construction cost. Today there’s great focus on developing and improving the construction business and the framework selection receives significant attention. Research shows that frames with load-bearing walls are particularly effective in multi-dwelling buildings. The bearing walls are either casted on site or mounted as prefabricated elements. Depending on what’s preferred, the two methods leads to differences in time and costs. Overall the framework choice is difficult and studies suggests that companies make the choice based on old experience, rather than based on substantiated facts.

    The authors aim with this report is to examine and calculate the costs for three alternative framework systems for a specific project. The report will treat the economics but also the time aspect. To add further value, the authors will also present pros and cons for each frame. The study is conducted as qualitative and based on existing theories, which are compared with new empiricism. The results show that a frame casted on site provides the greatest economical savings and is therefore seen as the most beneficial choice for the examined project.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
1 - 1 of 1
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf