hh.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 1 of 1
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Aldegård, Alexander
    et al.
    Halmstad University, School of Business, Engineering and Science.
    Gapinski, William
    Halmstad University, School of Business, Engineering and Science.
    Metodjämförelse för fixturkonstruktion till prototyptillverkning2018Independent thesis Basic level (university diploma), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
    Abstract [en]

    The thesis work is done in collaboration with Prodtex AB, which works to

    develop digital tools to facilitate the constructor´s work in virtual environments,

    for instance CAFD within CATIA V5. What the client wanted the project

    participants to perform was a comparison of the company's semi-automatic

    software for fixture design, and the traditional construction method with CATIA.

    The reason for the method comparison is because Prodtex AB requires data,

    which they can present to potential customers.

    The participants produced a method to enable the necessary components of the

    project, the method consisted of training in fixture design, fixture construction and

    work with the consulting company´s application. These elements have been

    essential for the comparison to be reliable. The main part of the assignment

    consisted of constructing units for the given fixture. The reason behind this is due

    to the necessity of a certain level of experience in fixture design, which is required

    to be able to assemble units with an accurate and efficient procedure.

    The method comparison generated data in terms of time in the measurement areas,

    input, design and export that the project participants analyzed and compiled in the

    result section. Based on the statistics, participants were able to find answers about

    which features the software made the most time savings of, and how abundant

    these were in relation to the traditional design method. A conclusion about when it

    was beneficial for a company to invest in the software was based on reasoning

    deduced from the outcome discussion.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
1 - 1 of 1
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf