hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Predicting institutional long-term care admission in dementia: a mixed-methods study of informal caregivers’ reports
Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
University of Manchester, Manchester, England UK.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, ISSN 0309-2402, E-ISSN 1365-2648, Vol. 71, no 6, 1351-1362 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim: To investigate agreement between: (1) expected reasons and actual reasons for admission of people with dementia according to informal caregivers; (2) scores on measurement instruments prior to admission and the actual reasons for admission according to informal caregivers.

Background: Timely admission of people with dementia is a crucial issue. Information is highly warranted on whether informal caregivers are capable of prior identification of causes of admission and, can thus be considered a reliable prospective source on causes of admission.

Design: A cohort study among informal caregivers of people with dementia who made a transition to institutional long-term care.

Methods: Qualitative data on the expected and actual reasons for admission were collected via open-ended questions at baseline and follow-up. Furthermore, at baseline, data were collected using measurement instruments to measure pre-admission characteristics. Interviews took place between November 2010-April 2012. After categorizing the answers, the agreement between the expected and actual reasons was calculated. Furthermore, bivariate associations were calculated between the actual reasons for admission and scores on corresponding measurement instruments.

Results/Findings: For most informal caregivers, there was agreement between their statements on the expected reason and the actual reason for admission. A third of the caregivers showed no conformity. Bivariate associations showed that there is also agreement between the actual reasons for admission and scores on corresponding measurement instruments.

Conclusion: Informal caregivers can be considered reliable sources of information regarding what causes the admission of a person with dementia. Professional care should anticipate informal caregivers' statements and collaborate with them to strive for timely and appropriate admission. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2015. Vol. 71, no 6, 1351-1362 p.
Keyword [en]
care transition, dementia, family care, informal care, institutional long-term care, nursing, nursing home, predicting admission, reasons for admission
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-31585DOI: 10.1111/jan.12479ISI: 000354394800015PubMedID: 25069529ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84929512131OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-31585DiVA: diva2:947017
Funder
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 242153
Available from: 2016-07-06 Created: 2016-07-06 Last updated: 2016-07-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlsson, Staffan
In the same journal
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf