hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stakeholders' Perspective on Ecological Modeling in Environmental Risk Assessment of Pesticides: Challenges and Opportunities
Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Risk Analysis, ISSN 0272-4332, E-ISSN 1539-6924, Vol. 33, no 1, 68-79 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The article closely examines the role of mechanistic effect models (e.g., population models) in the European environmental risk assessment (ERA) of pesticides. We studied perspectives of three stakeholder groups on population modeling in ERA of pesticides. Forty-three in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders from regulatory authorities, industry, and academia all over Europe. The key informant approach was employed in recruiting our participants. They were first identified as key stakeholders in the field and then sampled by means of a purposive sampling, where each stakeholder identified as important by others was interviewed and asked to suggest another potential participant for our study. Our results show that participants, although having different institutional backgrounds often presented similar perspectives and concerns about modeling. Analysis of repeating ideas and keywords revealed that all stakeholders had very high and often contradicting expectations from models. Still, all three groups expected effect models to become integrated in future ERA of pesticides. Main hopes associated with effect models were to reduce the amount of expensive and complex testing and field monitoring, both at the product development stage, and as an aid to develop mitigation measures. Our analysis suggests that, although the needs of stakeholders often overlapped, subtle differences and lack of trust hinder the process of introducing mechanistic effect models into ERA. © 2012 Society for Risk Analysis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. Vol. 33, no 1, 68-79 p.
Keyword [en]
environmetal risk assessment, ecological models, risk communication, stakeholders
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-30286DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01835.xISI: 000313728300008PubMedID: 22587756ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84872421371OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-30286DiVA: diva2:900024
Funder
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, PITN-GA-2009–238148
Available from: 2016-02-03 Created: 2016-02-03 Last updated: 2016-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hunka, Agnieszka D.
In the same journal
Risk Analysis
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 42 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf