hh.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychometric properties of the Swedish Child-Birth Self-efficacy Inventory (Swe-CBSEI)
Halmstad University, School of Health and Welfare, Centre of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport (CVHI), Health promotion and disease prevention. Department of Women's and Children's health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8354-3382
Halmstad University, School of Health and Welfare, Centre of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport (CVHI), Health promotion and disease prevention. School of Social and Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3924-1392
Department of Women's and Children's health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
2014 (English)In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, ISSN 1471-2393, E-ISSN 1471-2393, Vol. 14, no 1, article id 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Previous research has reported that women who are admitted to delivery wards in early labour process before an active stage of labour has started run an increased risk of instrumental deliveries. Therefore, it is essential to focus on factors such as self-efficacy that can enhance a woman's own ability to cope with the first stage of labour. However, there was no Swedish instrument measuring childbirth self-efficacy available. Thus, the aim of the study was to translate the Childbirth Self-efficacy Inventory and to psychometrically test the Swedish version on first- time mothers within the Swedish culture.

METHODS: The method included a forward-backward translation with face and content validity. The psychometric properties were evaluated using a Principal Component Analysis and by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and inter-item correlations. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to describe and compare the scales. All data were collected from January 2011 to June 2012, from 406 pregnant women during the gestational week 35-42.

RESULTS: The Swedish version of the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory indicated good reliability and the Principal Component Analysis showed a three-component structure. The Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test indicated that the women could differentiate between the concepts outcome expectancy and self-efficacy expectatancy and between the two labour stages, active stage and the second stage of labour.

CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish version of Childbirth Self-efficacy Inventory is a reliable and valid instrument. The inventory can act as a tool to identify those women who need extra support and to evaluate the efforts of improving women's self-efficacy during pregnancy. © 2014 Carlsson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: BioMed Central, 2014. Vol. 14, no 1, article id 1
Keywords [en]
childbirth, self-efficacy, instrument development, psychometric properties, think aloud
National Category
Health Sciences Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-24472DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-1ISI: 000331213400001PubMedID: 24383788Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84892462354OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-24472DiVA, id: diva2:691825
Available from: 2014-01-28 Created: 2014-01-28 Last updated: 2022-09-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. The movement towards birth: A study of women's childbirth self-efficacy and early labour
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The movement towards birth: A study of women's childbirth self-efficacy and early labour
2014 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Aim: The overall aim of this thesis was to increase the understanding of early labour, the latency phase of labour, based on women’s experiences and ability to handle the situation. Furthermore, the aim was to perform a psychometric testing of an instrument measuring childbirth self-efficacy and to explore the relationships to women´s well-being and number of obstetric interventions and birth outcomes.

Methods: In study I, a grounded theory method was used to obtain a deeper understanding of how women who seek care at an early stage experience the latent phase of labour. The same method, grounded theory was used in study II, but in this study, the aim was to obtain a deeper understanding of how women, who remain at home until the active phase of labour, experience the period from labour onset before admission to maternity ward. In both these studies (I & II) interviews were used to collect data. Study III and IV were cross sectional studies with a  consecutive data collection. In study III, a forward-backward translation was used to translate the childbirth self-efficacy inventory (CBSEI) into a Swedish version. An explorative factor analysis with principal component analysis was used to test the psychometric properties of the inventory and reliability tests with Cronbach's alpha and inter item total correlation was performed. In study IV, chi-2 test, Fisher's exact test and student's t-test for independent samples was performed between women´s estimated childbirth self-efficacy and demographics, obstetric interventions and birth outcomes. Correlations were also performed between different scales measuring well-being during pregnancy and childbirth self-efficacy. Finally a logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the probability for low or high childbirth self-efficacy.

Findings: Being in a safe place is essential for the women in the early labour process. But a safe place has different meanings for different women, depending on how they assess their own ability to handle their impending labour. For some women, the hospital is a secure place, a place where somebody else can take over the responsibility for themselves, the labour process or their child’s well-being. Some women choose to remain in their homes, which they consider as a kind of base camp which they can leave and go back to whenever they please. There is also a difference in how women ascribe ability to their own bodies and women´s belief in their own ability to cope and deal with the impending birth, their self-efficacy. These differences together with the women´s choice of seeking care or not, during the early labour process, affect the women´s experience of the labour process. The women's experience during the early labour process varies from feeling powerful and strong, to perceiving themselves as victims and feeling totally powerless. Women with high self-efficacy as measured by CBSEI had less previous mental illness and had more often been told their sister´s birth story. During the labour process, women with a higher childbirth self-efficacy have a lower frequency of epidural analgesia than women with low childbirth self-efficacy.

Conclusion: Women´s belief in their childbirth self-efficacy affects their choice of place to be, during the early labour process. The place in turn, affects the women´s experiences and the way they handle the early labour process. The early labour process is a sensitive period that requires attention and should not be neglected. Through increased knowledge and understanding of the problematic issues related to the early labour process, the birth preparation and antenatal obstetric care, as well as the care during labour can be improved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Karolinska institutet, 2014. p. 65
Keywords
Childbirth self-efficacy, early labour, factor analysis, grounded theory, logistics regression, pregnancy, well-being
National Category
Health Sciences Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-25949 (URN)978-91-7549-498-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2014-06-05, Samuelssonsalen, Schelelaboratoriet, Tomtebodavägen 6, Solna, Stockholm, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Examen: Medicine doktorsexamen

Available from: 2016-01-22 Created: 2014-06-27 Last updated: 2022-09-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(241 kB)355 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 241 kBChecksum SHA-512
acdc0cf14477fa8ee65701105869cea9d79e67ac180d9cd81e8d1a951cb633d102d9af907d85e643334a5fc4e143a83c318542ac4278c3b025b678ba1bf4d9c9
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Carlsson, Ing-MarieZiegert, Kristina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Carlsson, Ing-MarieZiegert, Kristina
By organisation
Health promotion and disease prevention
In the same journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Health SciencesClinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 355 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 475 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf