hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validity of reported energy expenditure and reported intake of energy, protein, sodium and potassium in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a dietary intervention study
Umeå university, Sweden.
Maastricht Univ, Dept Human Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands .
Visby Hospital, Dept Med, Visby, Sweden.
Umeå University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9291-9342
2005 (English)In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, ISSN 0954-3007, E-ISSN 1476-5640, Vol. 59, no 2, p. 238-245Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: The aim of the study was to validate a diet history interview (DHI) method and a 3-day activity registration (AR) with biological markers. Subjects and study design: The reported dietary intake of 33 rheumatoid arthritis patients (17 patients on a Mediterranean-type diet and 16 patients on a control diet) participating in a dietary intervention study was assessed using the DHI method. The total energy expenditure (TEE), estimated by a 3-day AR, was used to validate the energy intake (EI). For nine subjects the activity registration was also validated by means of the doubly labelled water (DLW) method. The excretion of nitrogen, sodium and potassium in 24-h urine samples was used to validate the intake of protein, sodium and potassium. Results: There was no significant difference between the EI and the TEE estimated by the activity registration or between the intake of protein, sodium and potassium and their respective biological markers. However, in general, the AR underestimated the TEE compared to the DLW method. No significant differences were found between the subjects in the Mediterranean diet group and the control diet group regarding the relationship between the reported intakes and the biological markers. Conclusion: The DHI could capture the dietary intake fairly well, and the dietary assessment was not biased by the dietary intervention. The AR showed a bias towards underestimation when compared to the DLW method. This illustrates the importance of valid biological markers. © 2005 Nature Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Nature Publishing Group, 2005. Vol. 59, no 2, p. 238-245
Keywords [en]
Biological markers, Diet history interview, Doubly labelled water, Energy expenditure, Mediterranean diet, Rheumatoid arthritis
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-20676DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602064ISI: 000226690200011PubMedID: 15483633Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-13944249585OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-20676DiVA, id: diva2:586296
Available from: 2013-01-11 Created: 2013-01-11 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Johansson, Gunnar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Gunnar
In the same journal
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 76 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf