hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The paradoxnoia of top journal(s) of top in marketing
Oslo School of Management, Oslo, Norway.
2006 (English)In: European Journal of Marketing, ISSN 0309-0566, Vol. 40, no 11-12, 1153-1168 p.Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose:

The objective of this paper is to explore the dominating approaches that appear in top marketing journals.

Design/methodology/approach:

This research is restricted to the exploration of one top journal in marketing. The journal title is kept anonymous as the topic goes beyond the targeted journal and aspires to be of interest to the marketing discipline and its research community. A triangular approach was used, which was divided into two parts.

Findings:

Part one - the exploration of the editorial descriptions of selected top marketing journals shows that they tend to describe their published articles according to some key features.

Part two - the content analysis of 151 articles generated an extremely skewed outcome. It appears to be almost a pre-requisite to have applied quantitative approaches in order to make it successfully through the blind review process and get published in the targeted journal.

Research limitations/implications:

This research is limited to explore one of the top marketing journals. The journal is kept anonymous as the idea is not to question or hang out a specific journal, but rather to stimulate the debate of current approaches published in the top marketing journals. Practical implications: The exploration of the top marketing journal shows a stereotype and myopic view of what is classified as "high quality" or "appropriate" research approaches. The editors and the editorial boards should let paradigmatic and dogmatic research myopia stand back in favour of broadminded and challenging research efforts. They should strive to avoid traditionalism and blinkers.

Originality/value:

An increased trust and acceptability of other approaches than quantitative ones in top marketing journals would be desirable. A humble request would be to give other approaches a fair chance to get into the arena of top marketing journals. The paper contends that there may be a fatal "paradoxnoia" of top journal(s) in marketing - a "paradoxnoia" of approaches that may harm and undermine the respectability of the marketing discipline and its research community. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Yorks, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2006. Vol. 40, no 11-12, 1153-1168 p.
Keyword [en]
marketing, serials, publications
National Category
Media and Communications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-18714DOI: 10.1108/03090560610702740ISI: 000242615000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-33750480892OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-18714DiVA: diva2:540889
Available from: 2012-07-12 Created: 2012-06-25 Last updated: 2012-12-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svensson, Göran
In the same journal
European Journal of Marketing
Media and Communications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 82 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf