A comparison between exposure-response relationships for wind turbine annoyance and annoyance due to other sources
2011 (English)In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, ISSN 0001-4966, E-ISSN 1520-8524, Vol. 130, no 6, p. 3746-3753Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Surveys have shown that noise from wind turbines is perceived as annoying by a proportion of residents living in their vicinity, apparently at much lower noise levels than those inducing annoyance due to other environmental sources. The aim of the present study was to derive the exposure-response relationship between wind turbine noise exposure in L(den) and the expected percentage annoyed residents and to compare it to previously established relationships for industrial noise and transportation noise. In addition, the influence of several individual and situational factors was assessed. On the basis of available data from two surveys in Sweden (N=341, N=754) and one survey in the Netherlands (N=725), a relationship was derived for annoyance indoors and for annoyance outdoors at the dwelling. In comparison to other sources of environmental noise, annoyance due to wind turbine noise was found at relatively low noise exposure levels. Furthermore, annoyance was lower among residents who received economical benefit from wind turbines and higher among residents for whom the wind turbine was visible from the dwelling. Age and noise sensitivity had similar effects on annoyance to those found in research on annoyance by other sources
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Acoustical Society of America (ASA), 2011. Vol. 130, no 6, p. 3746-3753
Keywords [en]
Acoustic noise, Wind turbines, Economical benefits, Environmental noise, Exposure-response relationships, Industrial noise, Low noise, Lower noise, Netherlands, Noise sensitivity, Noise source, Situational factors, Wind turbine noise
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-17593DOI: 10.1121/1.3653984ISI: 000298569100031PubMedID: 22225031Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84858328331OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-17593DiVA, id: diva2:524769
2012-05-032012-05-032020-05-12Bibliographically approved