hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Aphasia and Computerised Writing Aid Supported Treatment
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lund University, Sweden.
2009 (English)In: Aphasiology, ISSN 0268-7038, E-ISSN 1464-5041, Vol. 23, no 10, p. 1276-1294Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background:

Individuals with aphasia often experience difficulties in writing. Word processors with a spell checker and a grammar checker can compensate for some of the writing difficulties associated with aphasia.

Aims:

To determine if writing difficulties associated with aphasia may be reduced by the use of a computerised writing aid when training patients.

Methods & Procedures:

The writing aids used in this study were originally designed specifically for persons with developmental reading and writing difficulties and are based on statistics of frequent misspellings and phonotactic rules. Three participants with aphasia selected one of two offered writing aids. Written production during treatment and evaluation was recorded and analysed by keystroke logging. The study had a single-subject ABA design replicated across three participants. The baseline (A) was established by measuring four dependent variables. During a 9-week intervention phase (B) the dependent variables were measured once a week. A follow-up (A) was done 10 months after the training was finished. The dependent variables were: total number of words in a writing task; proportion of correctly written words; words per minute; proportion of successful edits. The results were analysed both visually and by statistical calculations.

Outcomes & Results:

All participants experienced a positive improvement in their writing ability. Results showed individual differences; after completed training the first participant made more successful edits, the second wrote more words, had a larger proportion of correctly written words, and made more successful edits. The third participant's results did not show any improvement that could be statistically supported.

Conclusions:

This study showed that the computerised training facilitated the generating process and made the revision process more efficient for the participants. The results are important in that they indicate possible ways of designing writing treatment. However, they also show the need for careful analyses when evaluating different treatment strategies and in discussing what improved writing ability may be.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Psychology Press, 2009. Vol. 23, no 10, p. 1276-1294
Keywords [en]
Aphasia, Writing process, Writing difficulties, Computerised writing, Aids, Treatment, Keystroke logging
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-5790DOI: 10.1080/02687030802436892ISI: 000269542400005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-70349133098OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-5790DiVA, id: diva2:351744
Available from: 2010-09-15 Created: 2010-09-15 Last updated: 2018-03-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Wengelin, Åsa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wengelin, Åsa
In the same journal
Aphasiology
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 46 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf