hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Derivation of implementation constraints – implementation simulation and treatment of multiple design choices
Halmstad University, School of Information Science, Computer and Electrical Engineering (IDE), Halmstad Embedded and Intelligent Systems Research (EIS), Embedded Systems (CERES).
Halmstad University, School of Information Science, Computer and Electrical Engineering (IDE), Halmstad Embedded and Intelligent Systems Research (EIS), Embedded Systems (CERES).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6526-3931
Generic Systems Sweden AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
2007 (English)In: Proc. of the 9th biennial SNART Conference on Real-Time Systems (Real-Time in Sweden – RTiS’07), Västerås, Sweden, Aug. 21-22, 2007, 21-28 p.Conference paper, (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The industrial use of ad hoc implementation methods for non-functional constrained tasks has resulted in unnecessary expensive projects. In some cases, ad hoc methods result in overly many iterations to be made and in some severe cases, total project breakdown. To be able to solve these problems a method has been developed to derive end-to-end non-functional constraints, such as timing requirements, to task-level constraints and to promote this information to the implementation phase of the project. For a tool, as the one described above, to be really useful it is important to be able to show that there is a potential cost reduction to be made. To be able to show that a certain implementation method costs less in work hours than to use an ad hoc implementation method, a model for implementation simulation with support for multiple implementation alternatives has been developed. The experiments show that using the budget based implementation method leads to a significant cost reduction in most cases, compared to the ad hoc method. As far as we know, no similar experiments has been done to compare implementation methods.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. 21-28 p.
Keyword [en]
Real-time
National Category
Computer Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-2732Local ID: 2082/3134OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-2732DiVA: diva2:239950
Conference
9th biennial SNART Conference on Real-Time Systems (Real-Time in Sweden – RTiS’07), Västerås, Sweden, Aug. 21-22
Available from: 2009-08-12 Created: 2009-08-12 Last updated: 2014-01-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(597 kB)280 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 597 kBChecksum SHA-512
8ddf7e07e3b2b859b808bacd8c36a57a19548524bf37c7e00b3997e597a7aead58630d3928594883df3bce69f33fcf3d44bc47f879833ebf77fb1cd8457a39a85bf52cd39031077d19ffcb68fd429058
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Weckstén, MattiasJonsson, Magnus
By organisation
Embedded Systems (CERES)
Computer Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 280 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 160 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf