hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Pain and health-related quality of life among cancer patients in final stage of life: a comparison between two palliative care teams
Halmstad University, School of Social and Health Sciences (HOS).
Halmstad University, School of Social and Health Sciences (HOS).
Dept. of Anaesthiol./Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Halmstad University, School of Health and Welfare, Centre of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport (CVHI).
2003 (English)In: Journal of Nursing Management, ISSN 0966-0429, E-ISSN 1365-2834, Vol. 11, no 3, p. 189-196Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A two-centred descriptive study was performed in order to describe and compare pain and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among cancer patients, in their final stage of life. The patients were cared for by either a nurse-led palliative care team I (PCT I) or a physician-led palliative care team II (PCT II). Forty-six consecutive, stratified patients (PCT I, n = 21 and PCT II, n = 25) participated. The medical outcomes study short form 36 (SF-36) was used for evaluating HRQOL and the Pain-O-Meter for assessing pain. Patients' pain intensity, pain quality and HRQOL showed no significant difference between the two groups PCT I and PCT II. The patients from PCT I had significantly longer survival time (P = 0.017) than those from PCT II. The different composition of the teams being led by nurses or physicians is worth further research; both from the patient's and staff's viewpoint, there may also be cost-benefits worth examining.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. Vol. 11, no 3, p. 189-196
Keywords [en]
Cancer pain, Final stage of life, Health-related quality of life, Pain-o-Meter, Palliative care, SF-36
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-347DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00360.xPubMedID: 12694366Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0037945395Local ID: 2082/660OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-347DiVA, id: diva2:237526
Available from: 2006-12-21 Created: 2006-12-21 Last updated: 2018-03-23Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Acute postoperative and cancer-related pain management: Patients experiences and perceptions in relation to health-related quality of life and the multidimensionality of pain
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Acute postoperative and cancer-related pain management: Patients experiences and perceptions in relation to health-related quality of life and the multidimensionality of pain
2003 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis describes patients in acute postoperative pain as well as patients with acute cancer-related pain in palliative care, and their experiences and perceptions of pain management in relation to HRQOL and the multidimensionality of pain. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods was chosen. Data were collected using interviews and questionnaires; APS, SF:36 and a new developed questionnaire PC-PPQ measuring care related to pain management in palliative care. For assessing pain VAS and Pain-o-Meter were used. The study group consisted of 100 patients on their second postoperative day, and of 75 patients with cancer-related pain from two palliative care teams. The result showed that at the time of the interview 29 of the patients with postoperative pain reported a pain > 3 on VAS and 79 reported VAS > 3 as worst pain past 24 hours. The higher the intensity of pain the less satisfied the postoperative patients were with the nurses´ way of treating their pain. Thirty-three patients stated that they had received information regarding the importance of pain relief. Patients with postoperative pain as well as patients with cancer-related pain had been prescribed analgesics mostly a combination of Paracetamol, NSAID and opioid. Of the 75 patients with cancer-related pain and in palliative care 22 patients reported pain >3 on POM-VAS and 47 patients reported >3 on POM-VAS as worst pain past 24 hours. Twenty-eight patients reported an average pain > 3 on POM-VAS past 24 hours. Twenty-four patients used the words troublesome or tiring when describing their affective pain. Sensory pain was described as prickling or sore by 15 patients. The patients perceived their pain as “aching all over” and expressed a wish for pain relief as well as a fear for increased pain. HRQOL especially physical functioning decreased for patients with average pain > 3. Being cared for by a nurseled or a physician-led palliative care team indicated no statistically significant differences for patients´ HRQOL or pain intensities. The patients had experienced a statistically significant better care after being referred to a palliative care team, despite that pain control had not been optimized. Patients expressed a need for communication, planning and trust in order to improve pain management. Continuity of care and the opportunity to talk increase the patients feeling of security, as well as improved their perceived pain control. Structured ongoing discussion concerning pain management from an early stage of the disease or already preoperatively can provide an important intervention to meet the results of this thesis. Pain assessment covering the multidimensionality of pain, and pain treatment plans including both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment are further important interventions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lund: Lunds Universitet, 2003. p. 144
Keywords
American Pain Society, Postoperative pain, Palliative care, Neoplasms, Health-Related Quality of life, Patient care management, Patients, Pain management, Pain-o-Meter, nursing care, SF-36
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-1906 (URN)2082/2301 (Local ID)91-628-5575-1 (ISBN)2082/2301 (Archive number)2082/2301 (OAI)
Public defence
(English)
Available from: 2008-09-15 Created: 2008-09-15 Last updated: 2018-02-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Boström, BarbroHinic, HansiFridlund, Bengt

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Boström, BarbroHinic, HansiFridlund, Bengt
By organisation
School of Social and Health Sciences (HOS)Centre of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport (CVHI)
In the same journal
Journal of Nursing Management
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf