hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Jämförelse av stomsystem för flerbostadshus i förhållande till tid, kostnad och CO2-avtryck
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability.
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability.
2024 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The choice of frame system is one of the first and most important steps in the design process. The decision is based on many key factors, including construction time, cost, and carbon footprint. There are studies that describe the different factors for various structural systems, but none that gather four of the most common systems in the same study.

This study, conducted in collaboration with Skanska, analyzes a prefabricated CLT (Cross-Laminated Timber) structure, a prefabricated concrete structure, a hybrid structure combining CLT and concrete, and a combination structure with steel columns and a flat concrete base, in terms of time, cost, and CO2 footprint.

Calculations and life cycle analyses have been performed on the four different frame systems, showing that the hybrid CLT and concrete structure performed the best overall in the three categories. The combination structure with steel columns and a flat concrete base followed, then the prefabricated concrete structure, and lastly the prefabricated CLT structure. Interviews with Skanska employees revealed that their knowledge and experience somewhat aligned with the results of the calculations and life cycle analyses, but the attitude towards continuing to work with the relatively new CLT structure was positive.

Abstract [sv]

Valet av stomsystem är ett av de första och viktigaste stegen under projekteringsprocessen. Valet grundar sig på många viktiga faktorer, bland annat hur lång tid de tar att bygga, hur mycket det kostar och hur stort CO2-avtryck det har. Det finns studier som beskriver de olika faktorerna för olika stomsystem, men ingen som samlar fyra av de vanligaste stomsystemen i samma studie.

Denna studie, i samarbete med Skanska, analyserar en prefabricerad KL-trästomme, en prefabricerad betongstomme, en hybridstomme i KL-trä och betong samt en kombinationsstomme med stålpelare och plattbärlag med avseende på just tid, kostnad och CO2-avtryck.

Kalkyler och livscykelanalyser har gjorts på de fyra olika stomsystemen, vilket visar att hybridstommen i KL-trä och betong var den stomme som i sammantaget presterar bäst i de tre kategorierna. Kombinationsstommen med stålpelare och plattbärlag kom därefter, följ av den prefabricerade betongstommen och sist den prefabricerade KL-trästommen. Intervjuer med medarbetare på Skanska visade att den kunskap och erfarenhet som de besatt i viss mån stämde överens med de resultat som kalkyler och livscykelanalyser visade, men att inställningen till att fortsätta jobba med den relativt nya stommen i KL-trä är god. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. , p. 66
Keywords [en]
Cross laminated timber, prefabricated concrete, hybrid, combination, cost, frame system, time, carbon dioxide emissions, sustainability, comparison, attitude
Keywords [sv]
KL-trä, prefabricerad betong, hybrid, kombination, kostnad, stomsystem, tid, koldioxidutsläpp, hållbarhet, jämförelse, attityd
National Category
Civil Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-53607OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-53607DiVA, id: diva2:1866506
External cooperation
Skanska Sverige AB
Educational program
Construction Engineer, 180 credits
Presentation
2024-05-24, S3030, Kristian IV:s väg 3, Halmstad, 11:25 (Swedish)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2024-06-07 Created: 2024-06-07 Last updated: 2024-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(6384 kB)70 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 6384 kBChecksum SHA-512
3ee4b77c03e134718be2687715be486b2f99c49df41d886464955b11393b7170e18908631e7d054da6eca87cf331ba38cb70ac327c2cd809fbb1e777e91d765b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability
Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 70 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 641 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf