hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The impact of task load on the integration of explicit contextual priors and visual information during anticipation
Division of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2151-8928
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Psychophysiology, ISSN 0048-5772, E-ISSN 1469-8986, Vol. 57, no 6, article id e13578Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is limited knowledge about the impact of task load on experts’ integration of contextual priors and visual information during dynamic and rapidly evolving anticipation tasks. We examined how experts integrate contextual priors––specifically, prior information regarding an opponent's action tendencies––with visual information such as movement kinematics, during a soccer-specific anticipation task. Furthermore, we combined psychophysiological measures and retrospective self-reports to gain insight into the cognitive load associated with this integration. Players were required to predict the action of an oncoming opponent, with and without the explicit provision of contextual priors, under two different task loads. In addition to anticipation performance, we compared continuous electroencephalography (EEG) and self-reports of cognitive load across conditions. Our data provide tentative evidence that increased task load may impair performance by disrupting the integration of contextual priors and visual information. EEG data suggest that cognitive load may increase when contextual priors are explicitly provided, whereas self-report data suggested a decrease in cognitive load. The findings provide insight into the processing demands associated with integration of contextual priors and visual information during dynamic anticipation tasks, and have implications for the utility of priors under cognitively demanding conditions. Furthermore, our findings add to the existing literature, suggesting that continuous EEG may be a more valid measure than retrospective self-reports for in-task assessment of cognitive load. © 2020 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2020. Vol. 57, no 6, article id e13578
Keywords [en]
cognitive load, decision making, electroencephalography (EEG), soccer
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-53289DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13578ISI: 000526587600001PubMedID: 32293720Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85083460440OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-53289DiVA, id: diva2:1854941
Available from: 2024-04-29 Created: 2024-04-29 Last updated: 2024-06-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Gredin, Viktor

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gredin, Viktor
In the same journal
Psychophysiology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf