hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Spelling in the Digital Age: Spell- checkers’ Impact on Writing: A quantitative study on the effects of spell- checkers on English grammar
Halmstad University, School of Education, Humanities and Social Science.
2024 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Due to the increased usage of technology and its indicated aid in writing acquisition, it is important to investigate the effects of spell-checkers on the English language. Thus, this essay has conducted a quantitative study to ascertain if there has been an improvement or regression in English spelling with the aim of gathering an indication of if and how spelling has evolved and changed with the development of spell-checkers. This study intended to answer two main questions: “Has spelling improved after spell-checkers were invented?” and “Can spell-checkers be seen as an aid in helping people learn how to spell better?”. Texts from before the development of spell-checkers and texts from after were utilized and searched for possible misspellings, to identify whether spelling has improved or not. The main finding was that there was a numerical difference between the two groups of texts, with the older texts containing an average of 43% misspellings as opposed to the newer texts which comprised an average of 7% misspellings. Thus, it was concluded that with the emergence of spell-checkers, spelling has improved. In relation to the second question, this research detected that although spelling mistakes have decreased, certain misspellings and errors are occurring, such as errors in transposition and omission, indicating that spell- checkers might not in fact be an aid in improving spelling competence. However, more data is required with regard to the second question, thus the answer remains inconclusive, with the need for further data to reach an assertive answer. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. , p. 31
Keywords [en]
Language acquisition, spell-checkers, technology, spelling, misspelling, transposition, substitution, omission, insertion
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-52536OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-52536DiVA, id: diva2:1834119
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2024-02-07 Created: 2024-02-02 Last updated: 2024-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1436 kB)401 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1436 kBChecksum SHA-512
af80daa685767f842792c40995654a92103fd183177b0a143567ff50ccf42e5c40860a897e04966f4278d8890cc96e60e99070c631811b331081a2bb4083e167
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Education, Humanities and Social Science
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 401 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1445 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf