hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A machine learning model for prediction of 30-day primary graft failure after heart transplantation
Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Halmstad University, School of Information Technology. Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1145-4297
University Of Utah School Of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States; Ishlt Transplant Registry, Dallas, United States.
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Heliyon, E-ISSN 2405-8440, Vol. 9, no 3, p. 1-10, article id e14282Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Primary graft failure (PGF) remains the most common cause of short-term mortality after heart transplantation. The main objective was to develop and validate a risk model for prediction of short-term mortality due to PGF after heart transplantation using the ISHLT Heart Transplant Registry. Methods: We developed a non-linear artificial neural networks (ANN) model to evaluate the association between recipient-donor variables and post-transplant PGF. Patients in the ISHLT registry were randomly divided into derivation and an independent internal validation cohort. The primary endpoint was PGF defined as death within 30 days due to Graft failure or Cardiovascular causes or retransplant within 30 days for causes other than rejection. Results: Among 64,964 adult recipients transplanted between 1994 and 2013, mean age was 51 years and 22% were female. The incidence of PGF up to 30 days was 3.7%. The ANN model selected 33 of 77 risk variables as relevant for PGF prediction. The C-index in the test cohort was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.68-0.71). The risk variables which most influenced the PGF were underlying HF diagnosis, ischemia time and sex, while renal function had a lower influence. Conclusion: An ANN model to predict primary graft dysfunction was derived and independently validated. The good discrimination of the ANN model likely results from its flexibility to model potentially non-linear relationships and interactions. Whether this model with improved discrimination can assist in clinical decisions at the time of transplant should be tested. © 2023 The Authors

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Elsevier, 2023. Vol. 9, no 3, p. 1-10, article id e14282
Keywords [en]
Artificial neural network, Heart transplantation, Prediction, Primary graft failure
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-50224DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14282ISI: 000969505000001PubMedID: 36938431Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85149794947OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-50224DiVA, id: diva2:1746445
Funder
Vinnova, 2017-04689Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20190623Swedish Research Council, 2019-00487
Note

The study was supported by the Swedish Research Council (2019-00487), Vinnova (2017-04689), Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (20190623), a government grant for clinical research, region Skane research funds, donation funds from Skane University Hospital, and the Anna-Lisa and Sven Eric Lundgrens Foundation. The supporting sources had no involvement in the study.

Available from: 2023-03-28 Created: 2023-03-28 Last updated: 2023-08-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ohlsson, Mattias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ohlsson, MattiasNilsson, Johan
By organisation
School of Information Technology
In the same journal
Heliyon
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 54 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf