hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Regularized conditional estimators of unit inefficiency in stochastic frontier analysis, with application to electricity distribution market
Jönköping International Business School, Jonkoping, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jönköping International Business School, Jonkoping, Sweden.
Jönköping International Business School, Jonkoping, Sweden.
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability. Ratio Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
2022 (English)In: Journal of Productivity Analysis, ISSN 0895-562X, E-ISSN 1573-0441, Vol. 59, no 1, p. 79-97Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In stochastic frontier analysis, the conventional estimation of unit inefficiency is based on the mean/mode of the inefficiency, conditioned on the composite error. It is known that the conditional mean of inefficiency shrinks towards the mean rather than towards the unit inefficiency. In this paper, we analytically prove that the conditional mode cannot accurately estimate unit inefficiency, either. We propose regularized estimators of unit inefficiency that restrict the unit inefficiency estimators to satisfy some a priori assumptions, and derive the closed form regularized conditional mode estimators for the three most commonly used inefficiency densities. Extensive simulations show that, under common empirical situations, e.g., regarding sample size and signal-to-noise ratio, the regularized estimators outperform the conventional (unregularized) estimators when the inefficiency is greater than its mean/mode. Based on real data from the electricity distribution sector in Sweden, we demonstrate that the conventional conditional estimators and our regularized conditional estimators provide substantially different results for highly inefficient companies. © 2022, The Author(s).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York, NY: Springer, 2022. Vol. 59, no 1, p. 79-97
Keywords [en]
C01, C12, C51, Conditional Estimators, Constrained Estimators, H21, Productivity, Regularized Estimators, Uncertainty modelling
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-48958DOI: 10.1007/s11123-022-00651-2ISI: 000894403900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85143340899OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-48958DiVA, id: diva2:1720275
Available from: 2022-12-19 Created: 2022-12-19 Last updated: 2023-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Söderberg, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderberg, Magnus
By organisation
School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability
In the same journal
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 31 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf