hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Goal motives and mental contrasting with implementation intentions facilitate strategic goal persistence and disengagement
Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4036-889X
Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5448-3990
University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, ISSN 0021-9029, E-ISSN 1559-1816, Vol. 52, no 11, p. 1094-1116Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In three experiments, we examine the role of motives underlying goal pursuit and the metacognitive strategy of mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) to predict the strategic use of self-regulation responses (persistence, disengagement, and reengagement) when faced with attainable, unattainable, or multiple goals. We trained half of the participants to use MCII and treated the rest as control. Experiment 1 (N = 261) underscored the role of autonomous motivation in nurturing adaptive cognitive appraisals and coping mechanisms, which facilitated persistence and progress with a difficult but attainable goal. In contrast, controlled motives undermined striving by predicting threat appraisals and giving up coping. MCII training ameliorated the negative impact of controlled motivation on goal striving by reducing threat appraisals. In Experiment 2 (N = 391), we manipulated the task to make the initial goal unattainable. Strategic goal striving (disengagement from the unattainable goal followed by reengagement with an alternative goal) was facilitated by MCII and autonomous goal motives, and culminated in increases in positive affect. In Experiment 3 (N = 432), we extended these findings to a multiple-goal setting. The research further develops the literatures on self-regulation and self-determination, while having implications for life domains where individuals pursue multiple and/or difficult goals. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2022. Vol. 52, no 11, p. 1094-1116
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-48125DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12915ISI: 000839531600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85135937753OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-48125DiVA, id: diva2:1698022
Note

Funding: Australian Research Council grant (DP200101555) awarded to the authors (PI: Ntoumanis). Open access publishing facilitated by Curtin University.

Available from: 2022-09-22 Created: 2022-09-22 Last updated: 2023-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sedikides, ConstantineGucciardi, Daniel F.Thøgersen-Ntoumani, CecilieNtoumanis, Nikos
By organisation
School of Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 22 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf