hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ecological impact of artificial light at night: Effective strategies and measures to deal with protected species and habitats
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, The Rydberg Laboratory for Applied Sciences (RLAS). Calluna AB, Nacka, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5322-9827
National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2134-0739
2021 (English)In: Sustainability, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 13, no 11, article id 5991Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

When conserving or protecting rare or endangered species, current general guidelines for reducing light pollution might not suffice to ensure long-term threatened species’ survival. Many protected areas are exposed to artificial light at levels with the potential to induce ecological impacts with unknown implications for the ecosystems they are designated to protect. Consequently, it is recommended that precautionary methods for the avoidance and mitigation of light pollution in protected areas be integrated into their management plans. This paper’s aims are to present an overview of best practices in precautionary methods to avoid and mitigate light pollution in protected areas and to identify and discuss what ecosystems should be considered light-sensitive and how to prioritise species and habitats that need protection from artificial light, including examples of legislation covering ecological light pollution in the European Union and in Sweden. The important aspects to include when considering light pollution at a landscape level are listed, and a proposal for prioritisation among species and habitats is suggested. Sensitive and conservation areas and important habitats for particularly vulnerable species could be prioritised for measures to minimise artificial lighting’s negative effects on biodiversity. This may be done by classifying protected natural environments into different zones and applying more constrained principles to limit lighting. The light pollution sensitivity of various environments and ecosystems suggests that different mitigation strategies and adaptations should be used depending on landscape characteristics, species sensitivity and other factors that may determine whether artificial light may be detrimental. Issues of the currently used measurement methods for artificial light at night are reviewed. We also propose and discuss the principles and benefits of using standardized measurement methods and appropriate instrumentation for field measurements of artificial light concerning the environmental impact of light pollution. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Basel: MDPI, 2021. Vol. 13, no 11, article id 5991
Keywords [en]
Biodiversity, Light measurements, Light pollution, Mitigation, Precautionary principle, Red list
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-46092DOI: 10.3390/su13115991ISI: 000660752000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85107538913OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-46092DiVA, id: diva2:1619332
Funder
Swedish Transport Administration, TRV2016/87245Bertil & Britt Svenssons Stiftelse för Belysningsteknik
Note

Funding: This research was funded by the Swedish Transport Administration, and the Swedish Transport Agency, grant number TRV2016/87245 and Bertil & Britt Svenssons stiftelse för belysningsteknik under the project “LED-belysningens effekter på djur och natur 2016–2017”.

Available from: 2021-12-13 Created: 2021-12-13 Last updated: 2022-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Jägerbrand, Annika K.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jägerbrand, Annika K.Bouroussis, Constantinos A.
By organisation
The Rydberg Laboratory for Applied Sciences (RLAS)
In the same journal
Sustainability
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 134 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf