hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Allonymous science: the politics of placing and shifting credit in public-private nutrition research
Department of Health Ethics and Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Halmstad University, School of Information Technology, Halmstad Embedded and Intelligent Systems Research (EIS). Department of Health Ethics and Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Health Ethics and Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
2020 (English)In: Life Sciences, Society and Policy, E-ISSN 2195-7819, Vol. 16, no 1, article id 4Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Ideally, guidelines reflect an accepted position with respect to matters of concern, ranging from clinical practices to researcher behaviour. Upon close reading, authorship guidelines reserve authorship attribution to individuals fully or almost fully embedded in particular studies, including design or execution as well as significant involvement in the writing process. These requirements prescribe an organisation of scientific work in which this embedding is specifically enabled. Drawing from interviews with nutrition scientists at universities and in the food industry, we demonstrate that the organisation of research labour can deviate significantly from such prescriptions. The organisation of labour, regardless of its content, then, has consequences for who qualifies as an author. The fact that fewer food industry employees qualify is actively used by the food industry to manage the credibility and ownership of their knowledge claims as allonymous science: the attribution of science assisted by authorship guidelines blind to all but one organisational frame. © 2020 The Author(s).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: BioMed Central (BMC), 2020. Vol. 16, no 1, article id 4
Keywords [en]
additive manufacturing, areal surface texture parameters, laser beam melting, powder based fusion, scale sensitive fractal analysis, shot blasting, surface metrology
National Category
Ethics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-43221DOI: 10.1186/s40504-020-00099-yISI: 000543429300001PubMedID: 32567015Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086848957OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-43221DiVA, id: diva2:1509985
Note

Funding Agency:ZonMW's Fostering Responsible Research Programme

Grant Number: 445001005

Available from: 2020-12-15 Created: 2020-12-15 Last updated: 2023-08-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lutz, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lutz, Peter
By organisation
Halmstad Embedded and Intelligent Systems Research (EIS)
In the same journal
Life Sciences, Society and Policy
Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf