hh.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The grey zones of technological innovation: negative unintended consequences as a counterbalance to novelty
Institute of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Department of Economy and Society, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8563-9078
2020 (English)In: Industry and Innovation, ISSN 1366-2716, E-ISSN 1469-8390, Vol. 28, no 1, p. 79-101Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this article is to better understand the challenges of avoiding the dark side of technological innovation. Specifically, we analyse 10 public investigations started as a reaction to a major crisis in regenerative medicine at the Karolinska Institute, Sweden, associated with the clinician-scientist Paolo Macchiarini. We interpret the reaction as an attempt to restore the balance between the stimulation and regulation of technological innovation processes by clarifying ambiguities in the regulation at the interface between research and practice. We conceptualise these ambiguities as grey zones–situations when it is unclear if the benefits of experimentation outweigh its risks–and propose that grey zones are continually created and resolved as actors in innovation governance systems counterbalance the generation of novelty and the risk of negative unintended consequences. © 2020, © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2020. Vol. 28, no 1, p. 79-101
Keywords [en]
grey zones, Innovation governance, innovation policy, medical innovation, negative unintended consequences
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-43646DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2020.1783216ISI: 000549499400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85087560455OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-43646DiVA, id: diva2:1508501
Funder
Swedish Research Council, VR DNR 2017-03360Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, FSK15 1080 1Swedish Research Council FormasAvailable from: 2020-12-10 Created: 2020-12-10 Last updated: 2021-01-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Saemundsson, Rögnvaldur

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Saemundsson, Rögnvaldur
By organisation
Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL)
In the same journal
Industry and Innovation
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 74 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf