hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Influence of different post-processing methods on surface topography of fused deposition modelling samples
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, The Rydberg Laboratory for Applied Sciences (RLAS).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8364-202x
ENISE, National Engineering School, Saint-Étienne, France.
Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Department of Electromechanical Engineering, Belgium.
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, The Rydberg Laboratory for Applied Sciences (RLAS).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2330-0597
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, ISSN 2051-672X, Vol. 8, no 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is gaining prominence due to its massive advantage in fabricating components without any geometrical limitations. The most widely used AM technique is Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM). FDM is an extrusion-based AM mostly focused on producing functional prototypes and in some cases as an end-product. One of the most common challenges associated with FDM is its reduced dimensional accuracy and surface quality. A fair amount of research has been carried out to identify the factors affecting print quality and measures to reduce surface roughness. On a few occasions, it is still necessary to achieve higher precision and quality to meet the standards set by conventional manufacturing. Hence, post-processing is employed as an additional step to reach the finish required. This paper focuses on enhancing the surface quality of FDM parts by subjecting it to Acetone vapour smoothening, Shot-blasting and Laser-assisted finishing post-processing methods. A comparative study is presented in this paper, where surface produced by different post-processing methods were compared to the reference injection moulding components. The results suggest that the acetone-based process has the best surface finish compared to the other two means; however, it leaves a very glossy appearance to the part. Shot blasting is very aggressive, and blasting time has a strong influence on the part quality. Laser-assisted finishing slightly ignites the top layer during melting leading to discolouration of the part. The optimum solution was found to be combining the post-processes, which not only reduced the roughness but also enhanced the aesthetic properties of the product. © 2020 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing (IOPP), 2020. Vol. 8, no 1
Keywords [en]
additive manufacturing, fused deposition modelling, post processing, surface metrology, areal surface texture parameters, profilomete, power spectral density
National Category
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-43270DOI: 10.1088/2051-672X/ab77d7ISI: 000517480500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85081609918OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-43270DiVA, id: diva2:1507836
Funder
Vinnova
Note

Funding Agency: TyloHelo Company 

Available from: 2020-12-08 Created: 2020-12-08 Last updated: 2021-01-04Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Towards Topography Characterization of Additive Manufacturing Surfaces
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Towards Topography Characterization of Additive Manufacturing Surfaces
2020 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is on the verge of causing a downfall to conventional manufacturing with its huge potential in part manufacture. With an increase in demand for customized product, on-demand production and sustainable manufacturing, AM is gaining a great deal of attention from different industries in recent years. AM is redefining product design by revolutionizing how products are made. AM is extensively utilized in automotive, aerospace, medical and dental applications for its ability to produce intricate and lightweight structures. Despite their popularity, AM has not fully replaced traditional methods with one of the many reasons being inferior surface quality. Surface texture plays a crucial role in the functionality of a component and can cause serious problems to the manufactured parts if left untreated. Therefore, it is necessary to fully understand the surface behavior concerning the factors affecting it to establish control over the surface quality.

The challenge with AM is that it generates surfaces that are different compared to conventional manufacturing techniques and varies with respect to different materials, geometries and process parameters. Therefore, AM surfaces often require novel characterization approaches to fully explain the manufacturing process. Most of the previously published work has been broadly based on two-dimensional parametric measurements. Some researchers have already addressed the AM surfaces with areal surface texture parameters but mostly used average parameters for characterization which is still distant from a full surface and functional interpretation. There has been a continual effort in improving the characterization of AM surfaces using different methods and one such effort is presented in this thesis.

The primary focus of this thesis is to get a better understanding of AM surfaces to facilitate process control and optimization. For this purpose, the surface texture of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Laser-based Powder Bed Fusion of Metals (PBF-LB/M) have been characterized using various tools such as Power Spectral Density (PSD), Scale-sensitive fractal analysis based on area-scale relations, feature-based characterization and quantitative characterization by both profile and areal surface texture parameters. A methodology was developed using a Linear multiple regression and a combination of the above-mentioned characterization techniques to identify the most significant parameters for discriminating different surfaces and also to understand the manufacturing process. The results suggest that the developed approaches can be used as a guideline for AM users who are looking to optimize the process for gaining better surface quality and component functionality, as it works effectively in finding the significant parameters representing the unique signatures of the manufacturing process. Future work involves improving the accuracy of the results by implementing improved statistical models and testing other characterization methods to enhance the quality and function of the parts produced by the AM process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology, 2020. p. 55
Series
Thesis for the degree of Licentiate of Engineering ; IMS:2020:8
Keywords
Additive manufacturing, Fused deposition modeling, Laser-based Powder bed fusion, Power spectral density, Scale-sensitive fractal analysis, Feature-based characterization, Profile parameters, Areal surface texture parameters, Multiple regression, Stylus profilometer, Structured light projection, Confocal fusion
National Category
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-43753 (URN)
Presentation
2020-10-29, "Sunnan- och Nordanvinden", Chalmers University of Technology, 5th floor, Hörsalsvägen 7A, Gothenburg, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-01-11 Created: 2021-01-04 Last updated: 2021-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Vedantha Krishna, AmoghReddy, Vijeth VenkataramBarth, HenrikRosén, Bengt Göran

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vedantha Krishna, AmoghReddy, Vijeth VenkataramBarth, HenrikRosén, Bengt Göran
By organisation
The Rydberg Laboratory for Applied Sciences (RLAS)Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL)
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 148 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf