hh.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Overcoming barriers in agri-business development: two education programs for entrepreneurs in the Swedish agricultural sector
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9584-3216
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4702-0626
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6679-8981
Halmstad University, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0002-0485
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, ISSN 1389-224X, E-ISSN 1750-8622, Vol. 26, no 5, p. 443-464Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The paper compares two government-sponsored education programs for agricultural entrepreneurs: a Leadership program and a Lean program. Methodology: The paper takes both a qualitative and a quantitative approach in its collection and analysis of data from 54 semi- structured interviews and from a survey with 109 participants. Findings: The main challenges to business and personal development are time pressure and the need for better communications. The Leadership program participants emphasize the effect of internal barriers such asfixed mind-sets. The Lean program participants emphasize the effect of external barriers such asfinancing. Both groups emphasize personal and business growth more than the control group. Practical Implications: Entrepreneur education programs can help participants, program developers, and advisory organizations identify and manage business challenges and barriers. Theoretical Implications: The paper contributes to the literature about educations for entrepreneurs in the agricultural sector with its examination of agricultural entrepreneurs’reflections on barriers and challenges in business development and their linkage to overcoming barriers focused on a resource-based perspective with different types of resources. Originality/Value: The paper encourages examination of development challenges and barriers from the perspective of participators in entrepreneur education programs. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Abingdon: Routledge, 2020. Vol. 26, no 5, p. 443-464
Keywords [en]
Self-leadership, leadership, agricultural advisors, management education programs, agricultural leadership, barrier
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-43290DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2020.1748669ISI: 000613501900003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85084089036OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-43290DiVA, id: diva2:1505431
Funder
Knowledge FoundationAvailable from: 2020-12-01 Created: 2020-12-01 Last updated: 2024-01-23Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Sustainable business model innovation in agri-firms
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Sustainable business model innovation in agri-firms
2023 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background The focus of the research in the thesis is the development of sustainable business model innovation in Swedish agri-firms. There are needs on global and national levels for sustainable business model innovation in the agri-sector. More food must be produced to feed the growing world population. Simultaneously, agriculture must become more sustainable even when the sector raises production. Hence, the firms in the agri-sector must become more sustainable even if they are raising production. In order to raise production, the agri-firms need to be profitable. Consequently, this generates the practical relevance and problem: How can agri-firms develop sustainable (economically, socially, and environmentally) business model innovation?

Purpose The neglect of theoretical research regarding sustainable business model innovation in the agri-sector is partly dependent on the limited empirical research regarding this phenomenon. Sustainable business model innovation in the agri-sector has not been closely studied, which constitutes an empirical problem. Against this background, the overall purpose of the thesis is to contribute to theorizing regarding the application and use of sustainable business model innovation in agri-firms.

To fulfill the overall purpose, two research questions have been formulated. Since the previous research regarding business models and business model innovation in the agri-sector is scarce, recent, and fragmented, there is a need to systematize research within the field. This leads to the first research question: What is the state-of-art research on sustainable business model innovation in the agri-sector? Further, previous research has neglected empirical studies of sustainable business model innovation in the agri-sector. This research strives to contribute to change and empirical studies of sustainable business model innovation in the agri-sector will be conducted. This leads to the second research question: How do agri-firms apply sustainable business model innovation practices? 

Methodology In order to understand and generate knowledge regarding sustainable business model innovation in agri-firms, different mixed methods assessed as suitable for the focus of the research have been used. The research process started with systematic literature reviews, followed by the conceptual development of a theoretical framework regarding sustainable business model innovation in agri-firms. Following, qualitative semi-structured interviews with agri-entrepreneurs were conducted. A smaller quantitative survey was also carried out. After that, a large quantitative telephone survey of agri-firms was conducted. Finally, eight qualitative cases are conducted based on interviews, financial reports and documentation in different media.

Findings and conclusions The value intention of the agri-entrepreneur has been identified as the starting point for development of sustainable business model innovation. Value intention has been added to the three previous building blocks of a sustainable business model; value proposition, value creation and delivery, and value capture. The building block value intention makes it possible to include the actor, the agri-entrepreneur, in the business model construct. Further, sustainability aspects have been added to all four building blocks of a sustainable business model. 

Stewardship has been identified as a concept which can be used to understand the value intention of agri-entrepreneurs striving for economic, social, and environmental goals. Stewardship can be understood from the interdependency between agriculture and environmental, human and physical resources. The definition of stewardship in this thesis is in contrast with the sustainable business model archetypes framework, where stewardship is one of the eight archetypes. In the thesis, stewardship is a concept of a higher order, a driver of sustainable business model innovation. 

Stewardship theory is a relevant theory when studying sustainable business model innovation in agri-firms. The manager of an agri-firm is often the owner of the firm, which means that a formal contractual relationship is not at hand. However, the manager/owner has commitments towards family, value chain actors, farm and land. This is especially valid when the agri-firm is conducting sustainable business model innovation, which contains considerations regarding society as well as environment, which can be regarded as the principals.

A dichotomization in farmer-producer and farmer-entrepreneur has been conducted. The dichotomization has implications in several dimensions. The dimensions which are elaborated upon are; main focus, value chain position, profit strategy, economics focus, size, logic, environmental and animal welfare laws and regulations, sustainability, innovation, and digitalization.

Implications Based on the conclusions of the research presented in this thesis, the farmers ought to regard themselves as entrepreneurs and ascend along the value chain.  A practical implication for agri-entrepreneurs is to involve sustainability aspects in all four building blocks more explicitly (i) value intention, (ii) value proposition, (iii) value creation and delivery and (iv) value capture. A practical implication for advisory organisations is that they should not focus on entrepreneur’s knowledge, what the entrepreneur should know. Instead, the focus should be mindsets, strategies for thought patterns and strategies for behaviours, what the entrepreneur should be able to do. For future research, the inclusion of value intention of the owner-manager and the importance of stewardship in further theory building regarding sustainable business models could generate important insights into potential trade-offs and barriers based on social, environmental, and economic aspects. This is important not only for research, but for practice in all sectors of industry due to the current and future societal challenges.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Halmstad: Halmstad University Press, 2023. p. 102
Series
Halmstad University Dissertations ; 100
Keywords
agri-entrepreneur, sustainable business model innovation, business model building block, value intention, stewardship
National Category
Economics and Business
Research subject
Smart Cities and Communities
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-51622 (URN)978-91-89587-13-7 (ISBN)978-91-89587-12-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2023-10-12, S1080, Kristian IV:s väg 3, Halmstad, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Knowledge FoundationBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Note

Forskningsfinansiärer: KK-stiftelsen, Stiftelsen Lantbruksforskning, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Available from: 2023-09-14 Created: 2023-09-14 Last updated: 2024-03-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ulvenblad, PiaBarth, HenrikUlvenblad, Per-OlaStåhl, Jenny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ulvenblad, PiaBarth, HenrikUlvenblad, Per-OlaStåhl, Jenny
By organisation
Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL)
In the same journal
The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 178 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf