hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Role of a Digital Return-To-Work Solution for Individuals With Common Mental Disorders: Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of Three Stakeholder Groups
Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5281-4087
Halmstad University, School of Health and Welfare, Centre of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport (CVHI), Health and Nursing.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4438-6673
Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9776-9304
Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7505-6955
2020 (English)In: JMIR Formative Research, E-ISSN 2561-326X, Vol. 4, no 9, article id e15625Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Although effective return-to-work (RTW) interventions are not widely available for individuals with common mental disorders on sick leave, there is potential for transforming such interventions into a digital solution in an effort to make them more widely available. However, little is currently known about the viewpoints of different stakeholder groups, which are critical for successful development and implementation of a digital RTW intervention in health care services.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine stakeholder groups’ perspectives on the role and legitimacy of a digital RTW solution called mWorks for individuals with common mental disorders who are on sick leave.

Methods: A purposeful snowball sampling method was utilized to recruit respondents. Semistructured individual and focus group interviews were conducted for stakeholder groups of service users, RTW professionals, and influential managers regarding their experiences, needs, and preferences for mWorks. Content analysis generated themes and categories that constituted the main findings.

Results: The legitimacy of a digital RTW solution was high among all stakeholder groups since such a tool was perceived to enable service users to take control over their RTW process. This was mainly a product of accessible support and promotion of service user decision making, which had the potential to empower service users. All respondents stressed the importance of fostering a positive user experience with usability and emphasis on service user resources and strengths, as opposed to various limitations and shortcomings. Stakeholder groups highlighted critical content to facilitate RTW, such as the need to clarify a back-to-work plan, accompanied by an accessible RTW network and strategies for handling mental health problems. Implementation challenges primarily involved influential managers’ concern of legislation incompatibility with innovative technology, and RTW professionals’ concern of the possibility that digital solutions may replace them to a certain extent.

Conclusions: This formative research emphasizes the importance of shifting power from RTW professionals to service users. mWorks can play a role in mediating service user control over the RTW process, and thereby increase their empowerment. A digital RTW solution may facilitate the circumvention of implementation barriers associated with introducing evidence-based RTW interventions in a traditional RTW context. ©Patrik Engdahl, Petra Svedberg, Annika Lexén, Ulrika Bejerholm.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Toronto: J M I R Publications, Inc. , 2020. Vol. 4, no 9, article id e15625
Keywords [en]
qualitative method, mental health, mHealth, quality improvement, vocational rehabilitation
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-43037DOI: 10.2196/15625ISI: 000853384900008PubMedID: 32936089Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85097024557OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-43037DiVA, id: diva2:1463708
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, Dnr 2016-07420
Note

© Patrik Engdahl, Petra Svedberg, Annika Lexén, Ulrika Bejerholm. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 16.09.2020. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

Available from: 2020-09-02 Created: 2020-09-02 Last updated: 2023-10-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Svedberg, Petra

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Engdahl, PatrikSvedberg, PetraLexén, AnnikaBejerholm, Ulrika
By organisation
Health and Nursing
In the same journal
JMIR Formative Research
Occupational Health and Environmental HealthNursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 181 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf