Consistency tendency and the theory of planned behavior: a randomized controlled crossover trial in physical activityShow others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Psychology and Health, ISSN 0887-0446, E-ISSN 1476-8321, Vol. 35, no 6, p. 665-684Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Objective: This study examined the effects of consistency tendency on the predictive power of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) in relation to physical activity behavior.
Methods: In this randomized controlled cross-over trial, we recruited 770 undergraduate students from Indonesia who were randomly assigned into two groups. Participants completed physical activity versions of TPB measures at T1 (baseline) and T2 (post 1 week), and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire at T3 (post 1 month). At T1 and T2, the TPB questions were either presented in ensemble-order (i.e., consistency tendency supressed) or alternate-order (i.e., consistency tendency facilitated).
Results: The parameter estimates of the model (CFI > .92, TLI > .90, SRMR < .08, RMSEA < .08) aligned with the tenets of TPB. As compared to ensemble-order, a TPB measured in alternate-order yielded stronger cross-sectional relationships, but this pattern did not appear in the prospective relationships in TPB (i.e., intention/perceived behavioral control and behavior).
Conclusions: Consistency tendency inflated the factor correlations of cross-sectionally measured TPB variables, but the inflation was not observed in the prospective prediction of behavior. Health psychology questionnaires with items presented in ensemble order may represent a viable means of reducing the confounding effect of consistency tendency. © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Abingdon: Routledge, 2020. Vol. 35, no 6, p. 665-684
Keywords [en]
Consistency motif, proximity effect, Socratic effect, common method variance, response bias, general response tendency
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-40953DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1677904ISI: 000491649400001PubMedID: 31642350Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85074457570OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-40953DiVA, id: diva2:1370376
Note
Funding: University of Hong Kong (104004966.092935.22400.301.01) & World Class University Funding Program for International Research Publication of Brawijaya University, Indonesia
2019-11-142019-11-142020-09-25Bibliographically approved