hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Metodjämförelse för fixturkonstruktion till prototyptillverkning
Halmstad University, School of Business, Engineering and Science.
Halmstad University, School of Business, Engineering and Science.
2018 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (university diploma), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The thesis work is done in collaboration with Prodtex AB, which works to

develop digital tools to facilitate the constructor´s work in virtual environments,

for instance CAFD within CATIA V5. What the client wanted the project

participants to perform was a comparison of the company's semi-automatic

software for fixture design, and the traditional construction method with CATIA.

The reason for the method comparison is because Prodtex AB requires data,

which they can present to potential customers.

The participants produced a method to enable the necessary components of the

project, the method consisted of training in fixture design, fixture construction and

work with the consulting company´s application. These elements have been

essential for the comparison to be reliable. The main part of the assignment

consisted of constructing units for the given fixture. The reason behind this is due

to the necessity of a certain level of experience in fixture design, which is required

to be able to assemble units with an accurate and efficient procedure.

The method comparison generated data in terms of time in the measurement areas,

input, design and export that the project participants analyzed and compiled in the

result section. Based on the statistics, participants were able to find answers about

which features the software made the most time savings of, and how abundant

these were in relation to the traditional design method. A conclusion about when it

was beneficial for a company to invest in the software was based on reasoning

deduced from the outcome discussion.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 39
Keywords [sv]
Fixturdesign, Fixtur process, Kunskapsbaserade system, CAFD, Prototyptillverkning, Metodjämförelse, CATIA V5.
National Category
Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-37026OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-37026DiVA, id: diva2:1217495
External cooperation
Prodtex AB
Subject / course
Mechanical Engineering
Educational program
Mechanical Engineering, 180 credits
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2018-06-19 Created: 2018-06-13 Last updated: 2018-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1912 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1912 kBChecksum SHA-512
1151f8f432441c0afc0f7e945b7c58950c597e18269d92859c800eba4478ed786081ab48d138091be0cd2bf0e2f0d08b0ad61908759cbe151a7dac81bd30b822
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Aldegård, AlexanderGapinski, William
By organisation
School of Business, Engineering and Science
Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf