hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Self-evaluation of skills and performance level in youth elite soccer: Are positive self-evaluations always positive?
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NIH), Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NIH), Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NIH), Oslo, Norway.
Halmstad University, School of Health and Welfare, Centre of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport (CVHI), Health and Sport.
2017 (English)In: Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, ISSN 2157-3905, E-ISSN 2157-3913, Vol. 6, no 4, 370-383 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study compared youth elite soccer players’ and their coaches’ evaluations of players’ skill level, and examined how this comparison was related to players' future performance level concerning national team experience. Based on the notions of the self-serving bias, it was predicted that players who overestimated their skill level relative to their coaches’ judgment, would be characterized by a high performance level in the past and a relative low future performance level; due to relatively high levels of performance anxiety and a frequent use of self-protection strategies. Results showed that the players (N= 267, Mage = 17.6, SD = 1.1), in reference to their coach, tended to overestimate their skills. This tendency was negatively related to players’ future performance level. Specifically, when controlling for age, past performance level and current performance level, a multinomial regression analysis (X² 18, N = 238) = 76.95, p ˂ .01) revealed that the players who overestimated their skills to the largest extent (compared to players that underestimated their skills), were less likely to produce a high performance level in the future (OR = .71, 95% CI = .54 - 18 .94). It seems that unrealistically positive self-evaluations can have negative effects in terms of performance development, but not through the mechanism of the self-serving bias, as measured in the current study. Nevertheless, it may be important for players to have a realistic view on their skill-level in order to progress and reach their potential. (PsycINFO Database Record © 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Washington: American Psychological Association (APA), 2017. Vol. 6, no 4, 370-383 p.
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-34033DOI: 10.1037/spy0000094Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85021756804OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-34033DiVA: diva2:1107552
Available from: 2017-06-09 Created: 2017-06-09 Last updated: 2017-11-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusFull text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ivarsson, Andreas
By organisation
Health and Sport
In the same journal
Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 49 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf