hh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Market Segmentation in Scientific Publications: Research Patterns in American vs European Management Journals
Dept. of Business Administration, Lund University, P.O. Box 7080, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden.
Dept. of Business Administration, Lund University, P.O. Box 7080, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden.
Dept. of Business Administration, Lund University, P.O. Box 7080, S-220 07 Lund, Sweden.
Högskolan i Halmstad, Akademin för ekonomi, teknik och naturvetenskap, Centrum för innovations-, entreprenörskaps- och lärandeforskning (CIEL), Knowledge Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Research (KEEN).
1996 (engelsk)Inngår i: British Journal of Management, ISSN 1045-3172, E-ISSN 1467-8551, Vol. 7, nr 2, s. 141-154Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Ideal science should conform to certain criteria or goals, among them the goals of universalism and commonality. Realization of these goals may be limited, however, through the dividing up of researchers in terms of geographical borders. In this study the general hypothesis is tested that there is a segmentation of the society of management researchers into a North American (US) and a European (E) segment, a segmentation which is furthered by differences in incentive schemes and in paradigms. Four leading management journals from North America and from Europe, respectively, and the 242 articles they contained published in 1993 were selected to represent the different geographical segments. The results provide: support for the existence of two such segments; support for differences in incentive schemes influencing the articles; support for their being paradigm differences between the two segments; and support for a paradigm effect being stronger in US-journals than in E-journals, US-authors are more willing, however, to conform to the E-paradigm than vice versa. We argue for methodological pragmatism in order to reduce the presumed counter-productive effects of paradigmatic rigidity.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 1996. Vol. 7, nr 2, s. 141-154
Emneord [en]
publication, segmentation, incentive schemes, paradigm, methodological pragmatism
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-21803DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00175.xScopus ID: 2-s2.0-0030505357OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-21803DiVA, id: diva2:618012
Tilgjengelig fra: 2013-04-25 Laget: 2013-04-25 Sist oppdatert: 2018-03-22bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Collin, Sven-OlofUlvenblad, Per-Ola

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Collin, Sven-OlofUlvenblad, Per-Ola
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
British Journal of Management

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 261 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf