Enhancing nitrogen removal through macrophyte harvest and installation of woodchips-based floating beds in surface-flow constructed wetlandsShow others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Chemosphere, ISSN 0045-6535, E-ISSN 1879-1298, Vol. 359, article id 142284Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Wetland management maintains nitrogen (N) removal capacity in mature and overgrown constructed wetlands (CWs). We evaluated whether CW management by macrophyte harvesting, and subsequent installation of woodchips-based floating beds (WFBs) planted with Glyceria maxima and Filipendula ulmaria improved N removal. In sixteen heavily overgrown experimental CWs, we applied four treatments: i) only macrophyte harvesting, ii) 5% of the harvested-CW surface covered with WFBs, iii) 20% WFBs cover, and iv) a control treatment (heavily overgrown). N removal was determined in all wetlands at nine occasions. Plant biomass accrual, N assimilation, and denitrification genes nirS, nirK, nosZI and nosZII on plant roots and woodchips from WFBs were estimated. Macrophyte harvesting improved N removal of heavily overgrown CWs, whereas subsequent WFB installation only sometimes improved N removal. Mean N removal efficiencies (± standard deviation) overall were 41 ± 15 %, 45 ± 20 %, 46 ± 16 % and 27 ± 8.3 % for treatments i to iv, respectively. Relative biomass production, root length and root surface area for G. maxima (mean ± standard deviation: 234 ± 114 %, 40 ± 6.5 cm, 6308 ± 1059 cm2g-1, respectively) were higher than those for F. ulmaria (63 ± 86 %, 28 ± 12 cm, 3131 ± 535 cm2g-1, respectively) whereas biomass N assimilation was higher for F. ulmaria (1.8 ± 0.9 gNm−2 of WFB) than for G. maxima (1.3 ± 0.5 gNm−2 of WFB). Denitrification gene abundance was higher on plant roots than on woodchips while G. maxima hosted higher root denitrification gene abundance than F. ulmaria. We conclude that macrophyte harvesting improves N removal in heavily overgrown CWs. WFBs installation has the potential to support plant growth and denitrification in surface-flow constructed wetlands. Further studies need to evaluate the long-term effects of macrophyte harvesting and WFB installation on N removal in CWs. © 2024 The Authors
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 359, article id 142284
Keywords [en]
Aquatic plants, Floating wetlands, Nitrogen uptake, Wetland biofilm, Wetland restoration
National Category
Biological Sciences
Research subject
Smart Cities and Communities, PROACTS
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-53350DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142284PubMedID: 38719124Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85192322081OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-53350DiVA, id: diva2:1865794
Funder
Linnaeus UniversityHalmstad UniversitySwedish Environmental Protection Agency, 19/114
Note
This study was funded by Stiftelsen Oscar och Lili Lamms Minne (grant no. FO2019-0012) to MC and SH and a grant for eutrophication prevention (övergödningsåtgärder anslag 1:11) from Vattenmyndigheten Västerhavet to AL. AL, JN, SW and PME were supported by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency [grant number 19/114]. We thank Matyas Baan for field and laboratory assistance, Kuno Kasak and Mikk Espenberg for supporting qPCR analysis, and Halmstad University and Linnaeus University for support and use of facilities.
2024-06-052024-06-052024-10-10Bibliographically approved