hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ancient equality against modern democracy: resources of critique in Hannah Arendt and Ellen Meiksins Wood
Department of Literature, History of Ideas, and Religion, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5083-4546
Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2019 (English)In: Distinktion Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, ISSN 1600-910X, E-ISSN 2159-9149, Vol. 21, no 1, p. 19-45Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Increasing discontent with the current status of democracy has prompted a renewed interest in Athenian democracy. This article contributes with the first comparative analysis of two political theoreticians–Hannah Arendt and Ellen Meiksins Wood–whose reactivations of ancient political experiences significantly predate recent trends. Despite the fact that Arendt levelled fierce critique against the Marxist tradition of which Wood was a part, it is shown how both thinkers involved a close consideration of the relation between the social/economic and the political in their analyses; regarded Athenian forms of equality as the differentia specifica when measured against modernincarnations of democracy; committed themselves to the controversial move to grant slavery a marginal role in their analyses; turned to the American Revolution to discern the specificity of the ancient forms equality and modern democracy; and how both departed from the mainstream definitions of democracy as a list of institutions or a number of criteria. We argue that Arendt and Wood reach similar conclusions about the distinctive form of separation between the political and the social/economic in Athens, reach different conclusions about the distinctive forms of collapse and separation respectively in the modern epoch, but nonetheless unite in their critique of the American Revolution. On those premises, the central aim is to investigate how the reactivation of Athenian equality can serve as a resource for critique of three forms of equality that underpins democracy in the modern age, which we designate formal, distributive and imaginary equality. © 2019 The Author(s)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Abingdon: Routledge, 2019. Vol. 21, no 1, p. 19-45
Keywords [en]
Athenian democracy, Ellen Meiksins Wood, Equality, Hannah Arendt, isegoria, isonomia, modern democracy, the American Revolution
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-48433DOI: 10.1080/1600910x.2019.1653347ISI: 000484758200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85071982069OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-48433DiVA, id: diva2:1703311
Available from: 2022-10-12 Created: 2022-10-12 Last updated: 2022-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Wedin, Tomas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wedin, Tomas
In the same journal
Distinktion Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf