hh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How individual cognitions overshadow regulations and group norms: a study of government venture capital decisions
Halmstad University, School of Business, Engineering and Science, Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL). Entrepreneurship & Innovation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3377-6177
Entrepreneurship & Innovation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0290-7522
Entrepreneurship, Management and Organisation, Hanken School of Business, Helsinki, Finland & Entrepreneurship & Innovation, St. Gallen University, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Entrepreneurship & Innovation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden & School of Management, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3255-414X
2019 (English)In: Small Business Economics, ISSN 0921-898X, E-ISSN 1573-0913Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

This paper explores how government venture capitalists approve or reject financing applications. Based on longitudinal observations, complemented by interviews, documentation, and secondary data, the findings show the limited influence of the regulative and normative logics (e.g., formal guidelines and accepted behavior) on government venture capitalists’ decisions. Instead, individual decisions are observed to be largely overshadowed by cognitions and heuristics, which dominate formal regulations and socially constructed group-level norms. Although official decision communications state that regulations have been followed, the evidence suggests that the cognitive logic dominates the funding decision-making process through a set of overshadowing forces that restrict the influence of the normative and regulative logics on funding decisions. This research has implications for venture financing and highlights the importance of cognitions in shaping venture capital decisions. © 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York, USA: Springer, 2019.
Keywords [en]
Government investment, Venture financing, Venture capital, Entrepreneurship, Institutional theory, Decision making
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-41325DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00273-3ISI: 000492646700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85074475828OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-41325DiVA, id: diva2:1382436
Note

Funder: Halmstad University

Available from: 2020-01-03 Created: 2020-01-03 Last updated: 2020-01-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Johansson, Jeaneth

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, JeanethMalmström, MalinParida, Vinit
By organisation
Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL)
In the same journal
Small Business Economics
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 15 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf