hh.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ancient equality against modern democracy: resources of critique in Hannah Arendt and Ellen Meiksins Wood
Department of Literature, History of Ideas, and Religion, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-5083-4546
Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2019 (Engelska)Ingår i: Distinktion Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, ISSN 1600-910X, E-ISSN 2159-9149, Vol. 21, nr 1, s. 19-45Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Increasing discontent with the current status of democracy has prompted a renewed interest in Athenian democracy. This article contributes with the first comparative analysis of two political theoreticians–Hannah Arendt and Ellen Meiksins Wood–whose reactivations of ancient political experiences significantly predate recent trends. Despite the fact that Arendt levelled fierce critique against the Marxist tradition of which Wood was a part, it is shown how both thinkers involved a close consideration of the relation between the social/economic and the political in their analyses; regarded Athenian forms of equality as the differentia specifica when measured against modernincarnations of democracy; committed themselves to the controversial move to grant slavery a marginal role in their analyses; turned to the American Revolution to discern the specificity of the ancient forms equality and modern democracy; and how both departed from the mainstream definitions of democracy as a list of institutions or a number of criteria. We argue that Arendt and Wood reach similar conclusions about the distinctive form of separation between the political and the social/economic in Athens, reach different conclusions about the distinctive forms of collapse and separation respectively in the modern epoch, but nonetheless unite in their critique of the American Revolution. On those premises, the central aim is to investigate how the reactivation of Athenian equality can serve as a resource for critique of three forms of equality that underpins democracy in the modern age, which we designate formal, distributive and imaginary equality. © 2019 The Author(s)

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Abingdon: Routledge, 2019. Vol. 21, nr 1, s. 19-45
Nyckelord [en]
Athenian democracy, Ellen Meiksins Wood, Equality, Hannah Arendt, isegoria, isonomia, modern democracy, the American Revolution
Nationell ämneskategori
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-48433DOI: 10.1080/1600910x.2019.1653347ISI: 000484758200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85071982069OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-48433DiVA, id: diva2:1703311
Tillgänglig från: 2022-10-12 Skapad: 2022-10-12 Senast uppdaterad: 2022-10-18Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

Wedin, Tomas

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Wedin, Tomas
I samma tidskrift
Distinktion Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 21 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf