hh.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 2): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals
Department of Design Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7874-7970
Department of Design Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-6308-3662
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: JMIR mental health, ISSN 2368-7959, Vol. 5, nr 2, artikel-id e10521Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: This is the second of two papers presenting the results from a study of the implementation of patient online access to their electronic health records (here referred to as Open Notes) in adult psychiatric care in Sweden. The study contributes an important understanding of both the expectations and concerns that existed among health care professionals before the introduction of the Open Notes Service in psychiatry and the perceived impact of the technology on their own work and patient behavior after the implementation. The results from the previously published baseline survey showed that psychiatric health care professionals generally thought that Open Notes would influence both the patients and their own practice negatively.

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe and discuss how health care professionals in adult psychiatric care in Region Skåne in southern Sweden experienced the influence of Open Notes on their patients and their own practice, and to compare the results with those of the baseline study.

Methods: We distributed a full population Web-based questionnaire to psychiatric care professionals in Region Skåne in the spring of 2017, which was one and a half years after the implementation of the service. The response rate was 27.73% (699/2521). Analyses showed that the respondents were representative of the staff as a whole. A statistical analysis examined the relationships between health professional groups and attitudes to the Open Notes Service.

Results: A total of 41.5% (285/687) of the health care professionals reported that none of their patients stated that they had read their Open Notes. Few health care professionals agreed with the statements about the potential benefits for patients from Open Notes. Slightly more of the health care professionals agreed with the statements about the potential risks. In addition, the results indicate that there was little impact on practice in terms of longer appointments or health care professionals having to address patients' questions outside of appointments. However, the results also indicate that changes had taken place in clinical documentation. Psychologists (39/63, 62%) and doctors (36/94, 38%) in particular stated that they were less candid in their documentation after the implementation of Open Notes. Nearly 40% of the health care professionals (239/650, 36.8%) reported that the Open Notes Service in psychiatry was a good idea.

Conclusions: Most health care professionals who responded to the postimplementation survey did not experience that patients in adult psychiatric care had become more involved in their care after the implementation of Open Notes. The results also indicate that the clinical documentation had changed after the implementation of Open Notes. Finally, the results indicate that it is important to prepare health care professionals before an implementation of Open Notes, especially in medical areas where the service is considered sensitive. ©Lena Petersson, Gudbjörg Erlingsdóttir. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 21.06.2018.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Toronto: J M I R Publications, Inc. , 2018. Vol. 5, nr 2, artikel-id e10521
Nyckelord [en]
Open Notes, eHealth, electronic health records, health care surveys, health professionals, mental health, postimplementation survey, psychiatry, telemedicine
Nationell ämneskategori
Arbetslivsstudier
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-38459DOI: 10.2196/10521ISI: 000449366300001PubMedID: 29929946Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85048892949OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-38459DiVA, id: diva2:1370971
Forskningsfinansiär
AFA FörsäkringTillgänglig från: 2019-11-18 Skapad: 2019-11-18 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-11-28Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(92 kB)44 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 92 kBChecksumma SHA-512
6bdc0616442a39df3b0096d90ef42f11c9d5f9eccd7eb5dbd15b8ebc521b1e15ae0587879a599a5cc6f3fe254d05fb9f4de24bbb22f50aea6ba62b6687782fb8
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Petersson, Lena

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Petersson, LenaErlingsdóttir, Gudbjörg
Arbetslivsstudier

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 44 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 47 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf