hh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validation of outcome measurement instruments used in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention for patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis: linking of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, construct validity and responsiveness to change.
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section of Rheumatology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section of Rheumatology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section of Rheumatology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section of Rheumatology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2011 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 43, nr 5, s. 411-9Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of 15 standardized instruments frequently used to measure the outcome of chronic arthritis treatment.

METHODS: Analyses were performed on data collected at a rehabilitation programme (n=216). The outcome measures evaluated were health-related quality of life, global health, pain, physical function and aerobic capacity. The instrument items were linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) (content validity), construct validity was analysed based on predetermined hypothesis (Spearman's correlations, rs), and responsiveness (after 18 days and 12 months) by the standardized response mean.

RESULTS: Most instruments covered the ICF component body function and/or activity-participation, only a few covered the environmental component. The short Euroqol-5 Dimensions performed as well as the longer health-related quality of life instruments in covering the ICF and in responsiveness. The health-related quality of life instruments did not measure similar constructs as hypothesized, neither did pain measures. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis indices covered several components of the ICF often exhibiting a large responsiveness. Aerobic capacity had the largest responsiveness of all measures.

CONCLUSION: Many instruments are not highly correlated, although at face value they appear to measure the same construct, information also applying to content validity and responsiveness. Results from this study can assist in choosing outcome measures in the clinic and in research.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2011. Vol. 43, nr 5, s. 411-9
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-22246DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0794PubMedID: 21448555OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-22246DiVA, id: diva2:622423
Tilgjengelig fra: 2013-05-21 Laget: 2013-05-21 Sist oppdatert: 2018-03-22bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Personposter BETA

Bremander, Ann

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Bremander, Ann
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 63 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf