hh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The development of a questionnaire for evaluating process-oriented group supervision during nursing education
Högskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för hälsa och samhälle (HOS), Centrum för forskning om välfärd, hälsa och idrott (CVHI).
Högskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för hälsa och samhälle (HOS), Centrum för forskning om välfärd, hälsa och idrott (CVHI).
The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Department of Primary Health Care, Göteborg, Sweden.
The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Department of Primary Health Care, Göteborg, Sweden.
2008 (engelsk)Inngår i: Nurse Education in Practice, ISSN 1471-5953, E-ISSN 1873-5223, Vol. 8, nr 2, s. 88-93Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The benefits of process-oriented group supervision are difficult to evaluate, as the validity and reliability of the existing instruments have been questioned. The aim was to develop and test the psychometric properties of a questionnaire in order to evaluate the effects of process-oriented group supervision on nursing students during their three-year nursing education. A 55-item Process-oriented Group Supervision Questionnaire (PGSQ) with a developmental design was formulated on the basis of a literature review and the expectations of nursing students who participated in a three-year nursing education programme (N = 176). Construct validity and internal consistency reliability were tested at the end of each study year: year 1 (T1), year 2 (T2), and year 3 (T3) by means of exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s coefficient. An adequate explorative factor analysis (principal component analysis, varimax rotation) with an Eigenvalue >1.0 and factor loadings >0.40, reduced the questionnaire to 18 items comprising three factors labelled educative, supportive and developmental, which explained 60.2% at T1, 71.8% at T2, and 69.3% at T3 of the total cumulative variance. The corresponding Cronbach’s coefficient figures were 0.89 (T1), 0.94 (T2) and 0.93 (T3). The 18-item PGSQ is considered to be a short and useful tool due to its satisfactory validity and reliability figures.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008. Vol. 8, nr 2, s. 88-93
Emneord [en]
Nursing student, Questionnaires, Reliability, Supervision, Validity
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-1330DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2007.04.006PubMedID: 18291325Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-39149126319Lokal ID: 2082/1709OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-1330DiVA, id: diva2:238548
Tilgjengelig fra: 2008-04-16 Laget: 2008-04-16 Sist oppdatert: 2018-03-23bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Arvidsson, BarbroSkärsäter, Ingela

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Arvidsson, BarbroSkärsäter, Ingela
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Nurse Education in Practice

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 223 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf