hh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nursing students' experiences of assessment by the Swedish National Clinical Final Examination
Lund Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Lund, Sweden..
Lund Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Lund, Sweden..
Sophiahemmet Univ Coll, Stockholm, Sweden.;Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci, Danderyd Hosp, Div Med, Stockholm, Sweden..ORCID-id: 0000-0003-3309-136X
Karlstad Univ, Dept Nursing, Karlstad, Sweden..
Vise andre og tillknytning
2013 (engelsk)Inngår i: Nurse Education Today, ISSN 0260-6917, E-ISSN 1532-2793, Vol. 33, nr 5, s. 536-540Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The Swedish National Clinical Final Examination (NCFE) was established in 2007 in order to examine nursing students' clinical competence upon completing their Bachelor's degree in nursing. The NCFE constitutes an innovative method of examination, divided into two parts: a written and bedside test. The aim of this study was to evaluate nursing students' experiences of being assessed by means of the NCFE, in order to obtain information that could be used to improve the examination. A survey was conducted using a questionnaire with open-ended questions concerning the written and the bedside part of the NCFE. The answers from 577 third-year nursing students were analysed using content analysis. The nursing students regarded the NCFE as promoting further learning and as an important means of quality assurance. Its comprehensive nature was perceived to tie the education together and contributed to the students' awareness of their own clinical competence. The strengths of the NCFE especially highlighted were its high degree of objectivity and the fact that it took place in a natural setting. However, the students felt that the NCFE did not cover the entire nursing programme and that it caused stress. It thus appears to be important to reconsider the written theoretical part of the examination and to standardise the bedside part. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE , 2013. Vol. 33, nr 5, s. 536-540
Emneord [en]
Education, Nursing students, Assessment, Survey, Questionnaire, Content analysis
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-35451DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.004ISI: 000319539300017Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84876849994OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-35451DiVA, id: diva2:1159341
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-11-22 Laget: 2017-11-22 Sist oppdatert: 2018-03-23bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Johansson, Unn-BrittZiegert, Kristina

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Johansson, Unn-BrittZiegert, Kristina
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Nurse Education Today

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 129 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf