hh.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Rånge, Max
Publications (7 of 7) Show all publications
Rånge, M. & Sandberg, M. (2019). Demokratins kris överdrivs – i själva verket ökar antalet demokratier. OmVärlden
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Demokratins kris överdrivs – i själva verket ökar antalet demokratier
2019 (Swedish)In: OmVärlden, ISSN 1400-4569Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.)) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Sida, 2019
Keywords
demokrati, demokratisering, MaxRange, statsvetenskap
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-41138 (URN)
Available from: 2019-12-05 Created: 2019-12-05 Last updated: 2020-04-29Bibliographically approved
Rånge, M. & Sandberg, M. (2017). Political Cultures as Context of Civic and Citizenship Education. In: 7th IEA International Research Conference: Researching education, improving learning: IEA Program. Paper presented at 7th IEA International Research Conference, 28 – 30 June 2017, Prague, Czech Republic (pp. 51-51).
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Political Cultures as Context of Civic and Citizenship Education
2017 (English)In: 7th IEA International Research Conference: Researching education, improving learning: IEA Program, 2017, p. 51-51Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The overarching aim in this paper is to contextualize civic and citizenship education practices, something which promises to settle an old social scientific dispute about the sources of trust in institutions: Is trust in institutions rooted in social psychology, culture and socioeconomic factors, or is it a response to institutional performance? Here, we analyze ICCS 2009 (International Civic and Citizenship Education Study) data at student level (approximately 140,000 students) in 37 countries and territories merged with the 2009 Quality of Government dataset that includes the World Values Surveys (WVS) national aggregates on trust and confidence. We also added MaxRange institutional data for 2009. First, a regression tree analysis is made, second a series of orindary least squares (OLS) regressions, and third, a structural equation model. Results strongly support the institutional performance theory and further explains the interaction between the political institutions and the political culture. In fact the former make possible the latter, so that attitudes and participation may be critical to established institutions while taking part in them. Influences on trust in institutions thus exist on all three levels investigated: institutional, cultural and individual-psychological. However, the interacting political-institutional and political-cultural influences dominate.

Keywords
trust, institutions, schools, multilevel analysis
National Category
Learning
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-35181 (URN)
Conference
7th IEA International Research Conference, 28 – 30 June 2017, Prague, Czech Republic
Available from: 2017-10-12 Created: 2017-10-12 Last updated: 2018-03-23Bibliographically approved
Rånge, M. & Sandberg, M. (2017). Political Institutions and Regimes since 1600: A New Historical Data Set. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 47(4), 495-520
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Political Institutions and Regimes since 1600: A New Historical Data Set
2017 (English)In: Journal of Interdisciplinary History, ISSN 0022-1953, E-ISSN 1530-9169, Vol. 47, no 4, p. 495-520Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A new data set provides vital information about the world’s political institutions, from 1789 on a monthly and yearly basis and from 1600 on a yearly basis. The yearly data set from 1600 has more than 90,000 country–year observations, and the monthly data set from 1789 more than 600,000 observations—by far the most comprehensive to date, offering several advantages over other available ones. The data set aggregates specific attributes to create nominal and ordinal rankings of political regimes on a scale of 1 to 1,000. In addition to supporting a rigorous classification of democratic and nondemocratic regimes, it allows researchers to trace institutional variations and to explore alternative ways of aggregating political institutions. As a research instrument, the MaxRange data set permits historically minded scholars to address a number of issues related to the dynamics of political institutions in an unprecedented manner. © 2017 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Inc.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge: MIT Press, 2017
Keywords
institutions, democracy, autocracy, absolutism, despotism, authoritarianism, regime, polity, path dependence, political system
National Category
History Political Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-32571 (URN)10.1162/JINH_a_01052 (DOI)000393188200004 ()2-s2.0-85011690455 (Scopus ID)
Projects
MaxRange
Available from: 2016-12-04 Created: 2016-12-04 Last updated: 2017-09-04Bibliographically approved
Rånge, M. & Sandberg, M. (2016). Windfall gains or eco-innovation?: ‘Green’ evolution in the Swedish innovation system. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 18(2), 229-246
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Windfall gains or eco-innovation?: ‘Green’ evolution in the Swedish innovation system
2016 (English)In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, ISSN 1432-847X, E-ISSN 1867-383X, Vol. 18, no 2, p. 229-246Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper therefore looks closer into climate gas emission and the shift to non-fossil energy in Sweden. What types of organizations are behind the shift to non-fossil energy use, what are the relative effects on emissions, to what extent can these interactive dynamics be considered eco-innovations? Do these effects vary between public and private organizations, and if so, can they be related to specific institutions and policies? Methods include statistical survival analyses, in particular Cox regression. These analyses inform us why energy sources shift. Results indicate that wood fuel and solid waste increase as sources of energy while fossil oil has decreased between 2003 and 2010. This result is in line with industrial and environmental policies of the Swedish governments that present these facts as institutionally and policy-related ‘green innovation’. However, our analysis contests such a conclusion and it is noticed that the shift to non-fossil sources of energy has not led to verifiable decreases in green-house gas emissions. Results instead suggest that ‘green’ innovation of non-fossil energy was mostly the effect of low-tech innovation in public organizations with no fundamental effect on CO2 emissions. © Springer International Publishing AG, Part of Springer Science+Business Media 2015

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Tokyo: Springer-Verlag Tokyo Inc., 2016
Keywords
Innovation, Fossil, Non-fossil, Energy, Sweden
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-29597 (URN)10.1007/s10018-015-0128-z (DOI)000377974900007 ()2-s2.0-84944584453 (Scopus ID)
Projects
”Miljöinnovationer i det svenska innovationssystemet”
Funder
The Crafoord Foundation, 20120695
Available from: 2015-10-11 Created: 2015-10-11 Last updated: 2018-03-22Bibliographically approved
Rånge, M., Wilson, M. C. & Sandberg, M. (2015). Introducing the MaxRange Dataset: Monthly Data on Political Institutions and Regimes Since 1789 and Yearly Since 1600. In: : . Paper presented at Second WINIR Conference (World Interdisciplinary Network for Institutional Research), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-13 September, 2015 (pp. 1-35).
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Introducing the MaxRange Dataset: Monthly Data on Political Institutions and Regimes Since 1789 and Yearly Since 1600
2015 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The MaxRange dataset provides information on political institutions for all countries of the world going back to 1789 on a monthly and yearly basis, and to 1600 on a yearly one.  The yearly dataset spanning 1600 to 2014 has over 90,000 country-year observations, and in its monthly format from 1789 has over 660,000 observations.  The time-series data are at least 200 years longer than any other comparable time-series dataset on political institutions.  Created by Max Rånge, the datasets aggregate specific attributes to create nominal and ordinal rankings of political regimes on a 1-100 scale (the MaxRange1 dataset) and on a 1-1,000 scale (the MaxRange2 dataset).  At the same time, however, the codes for each attribute underlying the categorization of political regimes are also included.  It is more detailed than any other dataset on political institutions, yielding up to 1,000 different unique combinations of institutional features.  In addition to supporting a rigorous classification of democratic and nondemocratic regimes, the dataset allows researchers to exploit institutional variation and to explore alternative ways of aggregating political institutions.  The MaxRange dataset on political institutions is by far the biggest and most comprehensive political regime dataset to date, and it offers several advantages compared to other available data.  In particular, the availability of monthly time-series data provides greater detail and reliability to support more accurate research on political transitions.  

Keywords
institutions, political institutions, democratization, democracy, dataset, time series, MaxRange, regime types
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-29352 (URN)
Conference
Second WINIR Conference (World Interdisciplinary Network for Institutional Research), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-13 September, 2015
Note

Article plus appendices, 57 pages.

Available from: 2015-09-02 Created: 2015-09-02 Last updated: 2018-03-22Bibliographically approved
Rånge, M. & Sandberg, M. (2014). “Civilizations” and Political-Institutional Paths: A Sequence Analysis of the MaxRange2 Data Set, 1789 – 2013. In: : . Paper presented at 110th APSA (American Political Science Association) Annual Meeting 2014, Washington D.C., USA, August 28–31, 2014 (pp. 1-46).
Open this publication in new window or tab >>“Civilizations” and Political-Institutional Paths: A Sequence Analysis of the MaxRange2 Data Set, 1789 – 2013
2014 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In what sequences have nations changed institutionally in history and does that order matter for later democratization? If so, are there historical-institutional pathways of “civilizations”? These previously neglected research problems are addressed in this paper on the basis of a new, unique, and enormous data set tracking all political institutions and systems in the world monthly since 1789. The aim is both empirical and theoretical: to take steps toward an understanding of the sequential aspects of political-institutional evolution. Results visualize sequences at regime level that show few signs of path dependency. They also show that democracy may emerge in all types of regimes, though at varying paces. Separating religious-majority nations, Muslim systems are less affected by democracy diffusion than other religious-majority nations. Muslim political systems also exhibit larger regime type unpredictability. Taken together with estimates of GDP per capita, majority religions explain a minor share of discrepancies between regime types: wealth of nations is more important than majority religion on a general, regime type diversity level. However, specifications of institutional details will have to be made in future research in this new area of historical political-institutional study.    

Keywords
sequence analysis, democracy, institutions, path dependence, regime types
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies) Globalisation Studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-26210 (URN)
Conference
110th APSA (American Political Science Association) Annual Meeting 2014, Washington D.C., USA, August 28–31, 2014
Available from: 2014-08-04 Created: 2014-08-04 Last updated: 2018-03-22Bibliographically approved
Rånge, M. & Sandberg, M. (2014). Windfall Gains or Eco-Innovation? 'Green' Evolution in the Swedish Innovation System. In: : . Paper presented at The 3rd edition of the International Conference Governance of a Complex World 2014, GCW 2014, “Smart, inclusive and sustainable growth: lessons and challenges ahead”, Turin, Italy, 18-20 June, 2014.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Windfall Gains or Eco-Innovation? 'Green' Evolution in the Swedish Innovation System
2014 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In theory, innovation processes lie behind the evolution of national systems as they create interacting dynamics among organisations. Institutions and policies are considered means for influencing these interactive dynamics, such as shifting innovative focus from traditional to environmentally oriented production, more environmentally friendly types of energy use, or environmental protection measures, products or services. Institutions and policies are thus considered drivers of change in technologies, processes, markets, raw materials or organisational forms--innovation in a Schumpeterian sense. Shifts in energy sources, from fossil to non-fossil sources, among organisations in the Swedish innovation system therefore call for explanations in terms of changed institutions and policies and their resulting eco-innovations. This paper looks more closely into climate gas emission and the shift to non-fossil energy in Sweden; what types of organisations are behind the shift to non-fossil energy use, what are the relative effects on emissions, to what extent can these interactive dynamics be considered eco-innovations, and if so, can they be related to specific institutions and policies? Quantitative analysis of evolving innovation processes in national systems is not always possible due to a lack of reliable and multi-level time-series data sets. This is also true for eco-innovations ('green' innovations). In the Swedish case, there are detailed data sets at national, regional, organisational and employee levels, making possible the estimation of evolutionary models. Register data can be merged with time series on environmental energy consumption and emissions. Data allow for a detailed analysis of environmentally oriented innovation from at least 2003. Analyses in this paper are based on time-series of data on the recent shift from fossil to non-fossil energy sources in the Swedish innovation system, as well as data on emissions, and potentially innovation promoting parameters at organisational and employee levels. Methods are quantitative, and Cox regression is used. Previous investigations of the energy use of Swedish organisations reveal a clear shift from fossil to non-fossil energy use. This is described both in terms of cumulative energy use and effects on emissions of carbon dioxide. Data provide us with information for conclusions on why energy sources change and in interaction with what organisational parameters. For example, wood fuel and solid waste increase as sources of energy while fossil oil has decreased during the years 2003 to 2010. This result is in line with national industrial and environmental policies and presented as institutionally and policy related 'green innovation'. But a quantitative analysis contests such a conclusion and it is noticed that the shift to non-fossil sources of energy has not led to verifiable decreases in green-house gas emissions. Public ownership is the single most important contributor to green innovation in non-fossil energy use. Still, CO2emissions are not fundamentally reduced by this low-tech shift, since they do not affect end-of-pipe reductions. What we observe is in fact wind-fall gains rather than eco-innovations behind the Swedish shift from fossil to non-fossil energy use.

Keywords
eco-innovation, time-series, register data, longitudinal environment innovation
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies) Economic History Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-25778 (URN)
Conference
The 3rd edition of the International Conference Governance of a Complex World 2014, GCW 2014, “Smart, inclusive and sustainable growth: lessons and challenges ahead”, Turin, Italy, 18-20 June, 2014
Funder
The Crafoord Foundation, 20120695
Available from: 2014-06-21 Created: 2014-06-21 Last updated: 2018-03-22Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications