Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Visa övriga...
2022 (Engelska)Ingår i: Technological forecasting & social change, ISSN 0040-1625, E-ISSN 1873-5509, Vol. 178, artikel-id 121561Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]
“Collective Intelligence” has been a popular area of research for more than a decade. We apply two different analytical approaches (local and global bibliometric analysis) to describe how this literature is organized and how it has evolved. A local approach focuses on the 3,138 articles indexed in the Scopus database where ‘collective intelligence’ is in the title, abstract, or keyword. A global approach reclassifies all of the Scopus documents into research communities using all (1.28 billion) citations in the database and proceeds to identify which research communities are populated by the 3,138 Collective Intelligence (CI) articles. These two approaches provide significantly different perspectives on how CI is structured, who the leaders of the field are, and how it is evolving. A synthesis of these two perspectives provides ideas for those who wish to contribute to the collective intelligence field. Our findings support the Kuhnian idea of research communities as a useful concept in bibliometric analysis. © 2022 The Authors.
Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
New York, NY: Elsevier, 2022
Nyckelord
Bibliometric analysis, Collective intelligence, Research communities
Nationell ämneskategori
Medie-, kommunikations-, och informationsvetenskaper
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-46490 (URN)10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121561 (DOI)000778411300005 ()2-s2.0-85124695215 (Scopus ID)
Anmärkning
Funding: Russian Academic Excellence Project ‘5–100′
2022-03-212022-03-212025-02-07Bibliografiskt granskad